2016
DOI: 10.1177/2041419616663274
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pressure–impulse response of semi-rigidly connected steel plates under blast loading

Abstract: In this study, a three-dimensional finite element model is developed to investigate the pressure-impulse response of the steel plates with semi-rigid connections under blast loads. The strain rate effect on the material properties is considered, and a number of spring elements are used for simulating the plate to support connections. Once verified, the developed finite element model is then used to investigate the effects of a series of parameters on the blast resistance and energy absorption capability of the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 38 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, construction materials must be selected for specific structural applications, considering both the structure and the backfill around it. Therefore, a number of new materials and methodologies for blast mitigation, such as porous materials (Levy et al, 1993; Radulescu and Lee, 2002; Teodorczyk and Lee, 1995; Tian et al, 2016; Wu and Zhou., 2011; Zhu et al, 2010), solid particles (Britan et al, 2001; Wagner et al, 2012), waver sheet (Meekunnasombat et al, 2006), concrete wall (Hao and Hao, 2014; Li et al, 2015; Lin and Ashraf, 2017), and water barrier (Chen et al, 2016), have been proposed and studied by researchers. It is much more meaningful to propose a new structural layout with traditional material, such as steel and concrete, to mitigate the blast loads (Whitney, 1996), considering the economic and technical benefits.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, construction materials must be selected for specific structural applications, considering both the structure and the backfill around it. Therefore, a number of new materials and methodologies for blast mitigation, such as porous materials (Levy et al, 1993; Radulescu and Lee, 2002; Teodorczyk and Lee, 1995; Tian et al, 2016; Wu and Zhou., 2011; Zhu et al, 2010), solid particles (Britan et al, 2001; Wagner et al, 2012), waver sheet (Meekunnasombat et al, 2006), concrete wall (Hao and Hao, 2014; Li et al, 2015; Lin and Ashraf, 2017), and water barrier (Chen et al, 2016), have been proposed and studied by researchers. It is much more meaningful to propose a new structural layout with traditional material, such as steel and concrete, to mitigate the blast loads (Whitney, 1996), considering the economic and technical benefits.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%