2021
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.103.104406
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pressure-induced phase transition in the J1J2 square lattice antiferromagnet RbMoOPO4Cl

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The optimization process under high pressure failed to sustain the atomic displacements and reverted back to the tetragonal phase, thereby eliminating the possibility. Experimentally, H. Takeda et al suggested that the high pressure phase of RbMoOPO 4 Cl above 2.6 GPa, indicated by anomalies in the pressure dependencies of the NMR shift and transferred hyperfine coupling constants, 8 might involve the mutual twisting of the MoO 5 Cl and PO 4 polyhedra, as occurred in MoOPO 4 , 7 breaking the mirror plane symmetry. However, the reliability of this hypothesis has yet to be validated through first principles calculations.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The optimization process under high pressure failed to sustain the atomic displacements and reverted back to the tetragonal phase, thereby eliminating the possibility. Experimentally, H. Takeda et al suggested that the high pressure phase of RbMoOPO 4 Cl above 2.6 GPa, indicated by anomalies in the pressure dependencies of the NMR shift and transferred hyperfine coupling constants, 8 might involve the mutual twisting of the MoO 5 Cl and PO 4 polyhedra, as occurred in MoOPO 4 , 7 breaking the mirror plane symmetry. However, the reliability of this hypothesis has yet to be validated through first principles calculations.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4(e), is ∼1.2 GPa, slightly smaller than the experimental value (∼2.6 GPa). 8 Since it does not account for kinetic effects in the calculations, hence, an underestimation of the actual value is plausible.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations