2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2017.04.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pressure mapping to prevent pressure ulcers in a hospital setting: A pragmatic randomised controlled trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
27
0
4

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
27
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Nurses require a minimum level of nursing knowledge to comply with repositioning policy. [37][38][39] Studies present nursing knowledge as the level of information that nurses have regarding the need for repositioning policy compliance in pressure ulcer prevention.…”
Section: Nursing-related Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nurses require a minimum level of nursing knowledge to comply with repositioning policy. [37][38][39] Studies present nursing knowledge as the level of information that nurses have regarding the need for repositioning policy compliance in pressure ulcer prevention.…”
Section: Nursing-related Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies demonstrated that pressure mats reduced hospital-acquired pressure injuries, 29 decreased the amount of time between patient turns 21,30 and promoted skin inspection of high-risk areas 30 while one study found no benefit. 31 Inertial sensors are adhered to an individual's chest or embedded into their clothing to wirelessly monitor a patient's position and movement. There are two brands of inertial sensors for pressure injury management that we are aware of: Leaf (Leaf Healthcare, Pleasanton, CA) and MovinSense (Kinematix, Porto, Portugal).…”
Section: Existing Repositioning Prompting Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This new technology has not been evaluated in randomized controlled trials or in regular hospital wards (Walia et al., ). Therefore, we conducted a randomized controlled study, the pressure mapping to prevent pressure injury (PPP) study, to evaluate the effect of a CBPM system in a regular hospital ward (Gunningberg, Sedin, Andersson, & Pingel, ). The PPP study failed to demonstrate a beneficial effect on the prevalence and incidence of pressure injuries.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The PPP study failed to demonstrate a beneficial effect on the prevalence and incidence of pressure injuries. However, the study could indirectly have increased staff awareness of pressure injury prevention, as annual prevalence studies showed a decrease from 38.6% (2015) to 15.4% (2016) (Gunningberg et al., ). The findings from the PPP study revealed a prevalence of pressure injury ranging from 24.2% to 28.2% in the intervention group and from 18.2% to 23.8% in the control group.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%