2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2010.10.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pressure mode fluid dynamic gauging for studying cake build-up in cross-flow microfiltration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Inspection of equations (2) and (3) shows that C d is proportional to ΔP 12 -0.5 : ΔP 12 increases as the nozzle approaches the surface and this confers advantages in terms of the accuracy required for a differential pressure transducer as well as setting alarms to warn of close approach to the surface. Pressure-mode duct flow FDG has been demonstrated in cross-flow microfiltration (Lister et al 2010;Lewis et al, 2012), ultrafiltration (Jones et al, 2012) and annular configurations (Gu et al, 2011a,b). Pressure-mode FDG is easier to implement at higher pressures and overcomes the problem of multiple steady states, as ̇ can be restricted to a small fraction of the bulk flow.…”
Section: Pressure-mode Fdgmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inspection of equations (2) and (3) shows that C d is proportional to ΔP 12 -0.5 : ΔP 12 increases as the nozzle approaches the surface and this confers advantages in terms of the accuracy required for a differential pressure transducer as well as setting alarms to warn of close approach to the surface. Pressure-mode duct flow FDG has been demonstrated in cross-flow microfiltration (Lister et al 2010;Lewis et al, 2012), ultrafiltration (Jones et al, 2012) and annular configurations (Gu et al, 2011a,b). Pressure-mode FDG is easier to implement at higher pressures and overcomes the problem of multiple steady states, as ̇ can be restricted to a small fraction of the bulk flow.…”
Section: Pressure-mode Fdgmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this work we present the application of pressure mode Fluid Dynamic Gauging (FDG) for estimating the thickness and cohesive strength of cake layers in cross-flow microfiltration of inactive yeast suspensions through a 5 μm nominal pore size cellulosic membrane. Although not strictly considered as non-invasive, this technique has proven an effective non-contact method for measuring cake-layer thickness in both dead-end [18], and cross-flow filtrations [19][20][21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, an enhanced FDG equipment is used to study soft cake fouling layers during cross-flow microfiltra tion of an organic model material, a Kraft lignin, which forms cohesive fouling layers and cakes which exhibit some degree of compressibility. Previous studies have concentrated on ultrafiltration under turbulent conditions (Jones et al, 2012), or microfiltration of near ideal particle suspensions (Lister et al, 2011). The use of lignin in this study demonstrates the complex behaviour of an organic material, which presents problems similar to those seen during the microfiltration of food based materials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 83%