2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2008.05.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pressure modeling of upward flame spread and burning rates over solids in partial gravity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
16
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
3
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is because that in Hefei, the pressure is much higher than Lhasa. According to Kleinhenz et al, 17 the flame spread speed v f }P 2 g. This agrees with our experimental results. …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 94%
“…This is because that in Hefei, the pressure is much higher than Lhasa. According to Kleinhenz et al, 17 the flame spread speed v f }P 2 g. This agrees with our experimental results. …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 94%
“…The atmospheric flame is yellow whereas the low pressure flame is blue. The shape and color of the flame at low pressure are similar to those observed in microgravity tests [24,25], which is understandable since reducing the ambient pressure reduces buoyancy [26].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 55%
“…At present, most low‐pressure fire studies compare the combustion characteristics of the same fuel at different altitudes . The experiments were primarily done in Lhasa (altitude, 3650 m; pressure, P = 64.3 kPa) and Hefei (altitude, 50 m; P = 101 kPa), and a small number of fire tests were performed at three to four altitudes and in a low‐pressure chamber . The fire test fuel was classified into gaseous, liquid, and solid fuel, and similar conclusions have been reached: In higher‐altitude areas, the flame height, flame volume, ignition temperature, and ignition time increase, but the burning rate and flame pulsation decrease.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…In the other method, which was to directly modify the environmental pressure parameters by software, the low pressure was usually accompanied by gravity changes, and there may be an error in the simulation. Based on the classical pressure model, the pressure‐gravity model was proposed by Kleinhenz et al On the basis of m max / D = f ( Gr ), P 2 g was kept constant, and different pressure level conditions were selected for the combustion simulation. The burning rate of combustibles was proportional to the characteristic length L. The ignition experiments of eight groups of polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) in different low‐pressure environments were simulated by McAllister et al using Fluent.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%