2022
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac5d3e
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pressure–Strain Interaction as the Energy Dissipation Estimate in Collisionless Plasma

Abstract: The dissipative mechanism in weakly collisional plasma is a topic that pervades decades of studies without a consensus solution. We compare several energy dissipation estimates based on energy transfer processes in plasma turbulence and provide justification for the pressure–strain interaction as a direct estimate of the energy dissipation rate. The global and scale-by-scale energy balances are examined in 2.5D and 3D kinetic simulations. We show that the global internal energy increase and the temperature enh… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
38
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 105 publications
(166 reference statements)
0
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fully kinetic simulations of collisionless turbulent plasmas, which retain both ion and electron kinetic effects, represent an invaluable tool for investigating the turbulent energy cascade down to electron scales (e.g., Grošelj et al 2018;Cerri et al 2019;González et al 2019;Roytershteyn et al 2019), its interplay with magnetic reconnection (e.g., Karimabadi et al 2013;Pucci et al 2017Pucci et al , 2018aAdhikari et al 2021;Agudelo Rueda et al 2021), and the role of electron-scale coherent structures in dissipating energy and heating particles (e.g., Camporeale & Burgess 2011;Parashar et al 2015;Yang et al 2017;Arrò et al 2021;Bandyopadhyay et al 2021;Yang et al 2022). They have also provided numerical evidence for an enhancement of the electron parallel temperature anisotropy in the outflows of strong reconnection events, which occurred spontaneously as the result of the interactions between subproton-scale turbulent structures (Camporeale & Burgess 2011;Haynes et al 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fully kinetic simulations of collisionless turbulent plasmas, which retain both ion and electron kinetic effects, represent an invaluable tool for investigating the turbulent energy cascade down to electron scales (e.g., Grošelj et al 2018;Cerri et al 2019;González et al 2019;Roytershteyn et al 2019), its interplay with magnetic reconnection (e.g., Karimabadi et al 2013;Pucci et al 2017Pucci et al , 2018aAdhikari et al 2021;Agudelo Rueda et al 2021), and the role of electron-scale coherent structures in dissipating energy and heating particles (e.g., Camporeale & Burgess 2011;Parashar et al 2015;Yang et al 2017;Arrò et al 2021;Bandyopadhyay et al 2021;Yang et al 2022). They have also provided numerical evidence for an enhancement of the electron parallel temperature anisotropy in the outflows of strong reconnection events, which occurred spontaneously as the result of the interactions between subproton-scale turbulent structures (Camporeale & Burgess 2011;Haynes et al 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[86] have included pressure strain interactions to modify the von Kármán equations. This modification extends the range of validity of these equations down to sub-proton scales implying the important role played by pressure-strain interactions in the kinetic range energy transfer; see also [85].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…An alternative approach to studying scale-to-scale transfer of energy in the fully kinetic limit is to apply scale filtering techniques to the Vlasov equation [41,[82][83][84]. Starting with the Vlasov equation, applying scale filtering techniques, one arrives at [82,85]…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations