2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00348-019-2831-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pressure–velocity coupling algorithm-based pressure reconstruction from PIV for laminar flows

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(2) for the pressure. Many approaches have been explored over the years, from direct integration using finite differences methods to complete implementations of CFD solvers like SIMPLE or PISO, where both the pressure and the velocity fields are calculated and corrected in an iterative process (Gunaydinoglu and Kurtulus, 2020;Regert et al, 2011).…”
Section: Numerical Solver In Openfoam®mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(2) for the pressure. Many approaches have been explored over the years, from direct integration using finite differences methods to complete implementations of CFD solvers like SIMPLE or PISO, where both the pressure and the velocity fields are calculated and corrected in an iterative process (Gunaydinoglu and Kurtulus, 2020;Regert et al, 2011).…”
Section: Numerical Solver In Openfoam®mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Standard techniques from CFD (Computational Fluid Dynamics) offers powerful and efficient tools to compute pressure fields from velocity fields (Gunaydinoglu and Kurtulus, 2020;Regert et al, 2011). However, the main challenge in the use of these tools is that PIV fields are generally noisy and available on grids that are often too coarse to reproduce accurately curved boundaries.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[25] extracted pressure fields from two-dimensional PIV snapshots using the SIMPLER algorithm on a non-staggered grid for laminar, incompressible and steady flow, whereas ref. [26] computed pressure from two-dimensional PIV data for incompressible, laminar steady and unsteady flows. Therefore, the novelty characterising the present research is its application to a turbulent flow with direct computation of Reynolds stresses from the PIV statistics and their inclusion in the source terms of the Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) equations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another approach aiming at the integration of PIV data and at the same time at the reconstruction of the respective pressure field consists of SIMPLE-based methods where the boundary conditions of the velocity are constructed from PIV data. To the authors' knowledge, only two other attempts following the latter reasoning can be distinguished: [21] extracted pressure fields from two-dimensional PIV snapshots using the SIMPLER algorithm on a non-staggered grid for laminar, incompressible and steady flow, whereas [22] computed pressure from two-dimensional PIV data, for incompressible, laminar steady and unsteady flows. Therefore, the novelty characterising the present research is the application to a turbulent flow with direct computation of Reynolds Stresses from the PIV statistics and their inclusion in the source terms of the Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) equations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%