2019
DOI: 10.1007/s10964-019-01008-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Presubmission Inquiries: Problematic, Counterproductive, and Unnecessary

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
(5 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, zeroing in on a specific journal a priori and fitting the Introduction to the aims and scope of the journal can save you time and effort from editing your Introduction later on to match the journal’s scope. A friendly, but believingly important, suggestion is to avoid sending pre-submission inquiries to the journal editors, unless it’s stated otherwise in the author guidelines for some specific article types, because they may be problematic, counterproductive, and unnecessary (Levesque 2019 ). Selecting your target journal in advance can also facilitate collaborations, especially for article types other than original research articles (e.g.…”
Section: Before Starting the Drafting Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, zeroing in on a specific journal a priori and fitting the Introduction to the aims and scope of the journal can save you time and effort from editing your Introduction later on to match the journal’s scope. A friendly, but believingly important, suggestion is to avoid sending pre-submission inquiries to the journal editors, unless it’s stated otherwise in the author guidelines for some specific article types, because they may be problematic, counterproductive, and unnecessary (Levesque 2019 ). Selecting your target journal in advance can also facilitate collaborations, especially for article types other than original research articles (e.g.…”
Section: Before Starting the Drafting Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These efforts also included reaching out to authors before they would even submit (or even begin the hard work of moving findings to publishable form). To give authors a better sense of acceptable manuscripts, increased information was provided to prospective authors so they could better understand the journal's expectations (Levesque 2007a(Levesque , 2019a. These initiatives were meant to work in tandem, but some were much more successful than others.…”
Section: Outcomes Of a Narrowed Missionmentioning
confidence: 99%