1977
DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1977.sp012005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Presynaptic inhibition: the mechanism of protection from habituation of the crayfish lateral giant fibre escape response.

Abstract: SUMMARY1. The mechanism of protection from habituation of the lateral giant escape reflex of the crayfish was studied. Experiments were designed to determine whether presynaptic inhibition of primary afferents for the reflex occurs following escape command neurone firing, and if so, whether it could account for protection of the first synapse from depression.2. Synaptic transmission between afferents and interneurone A of the escape reflex is strongly inhibited following giant fibre spikes.3. Giant fibre firin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, presynaptic inhibition of mechanosensory afferents ( Fig. 29; Kirk, 1985) greatly reduces the extent to which activity-dependent synaptic depression develops, and thereby protects the reflex from habituating to the stimulation produced by rapid movement through the water (Bryan and Krasne, 1977a;Bryan and Krasne, 1977b). These results demonstrated for the first time that central neural networks can not only regulate their own input, but moreover they can helpfully modulate their own plastic mechanisms.…”
Section: Protection Of the Synapse (During Tail Flip)mentioning
confidence: 81%
“…However, presynaptic inhibition of mechanosensory afferents ( Fig. 29; Kirk, 1985) greatly reduces the extent to which activity-dependent synaptic depression develops, and thereby protects the reflex from habituating to the stimulation produced by rapid movement through the water (Bryan and Krasne, 1977a;Bryan and Krasne, 1977b). These results demonstrated for the first time that central neural networks can not only regulate their own input, but moreover they can helpfully modulate their own plastic mechanisms.…”
Section: Protection Of the Synapse (During Tail Flip)mentioning
confidence: 81%
“…fibres. The conductance increase and associated excitability decrease would then be restricted to the terminal regions but the consequent depolarization would spread electrotonically further back along the preterminal axon where excitability would be increased (see Bryan & Krasne, 1977;Nicoll & Alger, 1979). Thus, an increase in excitability would be the observed effect of conditioning if the excitability test stimulus activated fibres in the preterminal region, a situation made more likely by the simultaneous decrease in excitability of the terminals themselves.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lateral excitatory network physiology was performed by placing one suction electrode on the nerve cord rostral to the terminal ganglion to stimulate the LG and for identifying sensory afferents by the primary afferent depolarization that results from an LG spike (Bryan and Krasne, 1977). One or two suction electrodes were placed on peripheral nerves of A6 to evoke afferent volleys (Fig.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%