2016
DOI: 10.14445/22315373/ijmtt-v36p506
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pretest Single Stage Shrinkage Estimator for the Shape Parameter of the Power Function Distribution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As shown in Figure (3.4), the absolute value for the bias ratio of DSSEs with respect to the reliability function RD1 of n 2 is similarly a decreasing function when (0.75 < Ξ» < 1.75 ). Meanwhile, as shown in Figure (12), the absolute value for the bias ratio of DSSEs with respect to the reliability functions RD2 of n 2 is a less-decreasing function. Therefore RD1 is better RD2 for n 2 .…”
Section: Figures (1)-(mentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As shown in Figure (3.4), the absolute value for the bias ratio of DSSEs with respect to the reliability function RD1 of n 2 is similarly a decreasing function when (0.75 < Ξ» < 1.75 ). Meanwhile, as shown in Figure (12), the absolute value for the bias ratio of DSSEs with respect to the reliability functions RD2 of n 2 is a less-decreasing function. Therefore RD1 is better RD2 for n 2 .…”
Section: Figures (1)-(mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…4. The absolute value for the bias ratio of DSSEs with respect to the reliability function n 1 is shown in Figures (11) and (12). RD1 decreases more than RD2 for n 1 when (Ξ» > 0.57).…”
Section: Figures (1)-(mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Journal homepage: http://jih.uobaghdad.edu.iq/index.php/j/index This process has been carried out with using and comparing different estimation methods such as Maximum likelihood estimation (MLE), Moment (MOM), least square (LS) and Shrinkage estimation methods (SH). The (c.d.f) of random variable X for power function distribution is given as in the following [7,8]. 𝐹(π‘₯, πœƒ, 𝛼) = π‘₯ 𝛼 πœƒ 𝛼 0 < π‘₯ < πœƒ βˆ’1 (1) While the probability density function (P.d.f) of power distribution can be defined as: 𝑓(π‘₯, πœƒ, 𝛼) = π›Όπœƒ 𝛼 π‘₯ π›Όβˆ’1 0 < π‘₯ < πœƒ βˆ’1 (2) Where Ξ± and ΞΈ represent the shape and scale parameters respectively.…”
Section: Ibn Al Haitham Journal For Pure and Applied Sciencementioning
confidence: 99%