1990
DOI: 10.1016/0007-1226(90)90078-e
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pretibial lacerations: a comparison of primary excision and grafting with “defatting” the flap

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Silk (2001) points out that the wound can be dif®cult to assess if a large number of adhesive tapes are applied. Haiart et al (1990) performed a small randomized study comparing split skin grafting to defatting the¯a p and securing with adhesive tape. In total, 25 patients were entered into the study.…”
Section: Methods Of Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Silk (2001) points out that the wound can be dif®cult to assess if a large number of adhesive tapes are applied. Haiart et al (1990) performed a small randomized study comparing split skin grafting to defatting the¯a p and securing with adhesive tape. In total, 25 patients were entered into the study.…”
Section: Methods Of Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An average time quoted for healing of pretibial lacerations with conservative management alone is 65 days, with many patients requiring subsequent surgery (Crawford and Gipson, 1977). A review of 25 pretibial flap lacerations managed by either primary excision and split skin grafting or replacement of the defatted skin flap found faster healing in the grafted group (mean 13.2 vs. 40.7 days) (Haiart et al, 1990). Other studies have advocated early mobilisation after showing no effect on the rate of healing when immobilisation is increased beyond 24 h (Wood and Lees, 1994) and a detrimental effect on hospital stay and return to independent mobility (Budny et al, 1993).…”
Section: Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Usually, the low mobility of the surrounding skin does not make a direct closure possible. However, wound edge approximation shows a high percentage of failure or requires long time to achieve complete healing [1]. Skin graft compared to wound edge juxtaposition shows an advantage in success rate and in healing time [1].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, wound edge approximation shows a high percentage of failure or requires long time to achieve complete healing [1]. Skin graft compared to wound edge juxtaposition shows an advantage in success rate and in healing time [1]. However, for major defects skin graft does not provide optimal coverage of the underlying structures (vessels, nerves, and tendons).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%