Pretreatment HIV Drug Resistance Increases Regimen Switches in Sub-Saharan Africa

Boender, T. Sonia; Hoenderboom, Bernice M; Sigaloff, Kim C.E.; Hamers, Raph L; Wellington, Maureen; Shamu, Tinei; Siwale, Margaret; Maksimos, Eman E. F. Labib; Nankya, Immaculate; Kityo, Cissy; Adeyemo, Titilope A.; Mandaliya, Kishor; Botes, Mariëtte E.; Ondoa, Pascale; Wit, Tobias F. Rinke de

doi:10.1093/cid/civ656

Cited by 48 publications

(54 citation statements)

References 35 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The impact of PDR on virologic outcomes among newly-diagnosed HIV infected children is not well established in resource-limited settings [22,[36][37][38][39]. In theory, PDR could compromise the efficacy of first-line cART regimens, thereby reducing rates of virological suppression and increasing subsequent rates of virological treatment failure.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Rates and Correlates of Short Term Virologic Response among Treatment-Naïve HIV-Infected Children Initiating Antiretroviral Therapy in Ethiopia: A Multi-Center Prospective Cohort Study

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

There is limited data on virologic outcome and its correlates among HIV-infected children in resource-limited settings. We investigated rate and correlates of virologic outcome among treatment naïve HIV-infected Ethiopian children initiating cART, and were followed prospectively at baseline, 8, 12, 24 and 48 weeks using plasma viral load, clinical examination, laboratory tests and pretreatment HIV drug resistance (PDR) screening. Virologic outcome was assessed using two endpoints–virological suppression defined as having “undetectable” plasma viral load < 150 RNA copies/mL, and rebound defined as viral load ≥150 copies/mL after achieving suppression. Cox Proportional Hazards Regression was employed to assess correlates of outcome. At the end of follow up, virologic outcome was measured for 110 participants. Overall, 94(85.5%) achieved virological suppression, of which 36(38.3%) experienced virologic rebound. At 48 weeks, 9(8.2%) children developed WHO-defined virological treatment failure. Taking tenofovir-containing regimen (Hazard Ratio (HR) 3.1-[95% confidence interval (95%CI) 1.0–9.6], p = 0.049) and absence of pretreatment HIV drug resistance (HR 11.7-[95%CI 1.3–104.2], p = 0.028) were independently associated with earlier virologic suppression. In conclusion, PDR and cART regimen type correlate with rate of virologic suppression which was prominent during the first year of cART initiation. However, the impact of viral rebound in 38.3% of the children needs evaluation.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Rates and Correlates of Short Term Virologic Response among Treatment-Naïve HIV-Infected Children Initiating Antiretroviral Therapy in Ethiopia: A Multi-Center Prospective Cohort Study

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Development of drug resistance in chronic HIV infection has serious implications [5,6]. Apart from the resultant limitations in the choice of effective treatment regimens, there are also extra cost implications associated with switches to second or third line therapy and extra demands on laboratory monitoring of patients [7][8][9]. Transmitted or pretreatment HIV drug resistance has significant impact on effectiveness of antiretroviral therapy.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Epidemiologic and viral predictors of antiretroviral drug resistance among persons living with HIV in a large treatment program in Nigeria

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Expanded access to combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) throughout sub-Saharan Africa over the last decade has remarkably improved the prognosis of persons living with HIV (PLWH). However, some PLWH experience virologic rebound after a period of viral suppression, usually followed by selection of drug resistant virus. Determining factors associated with drug resistance can inform patient management and healthcare policies, particularly in resource-limited settings where drug resistance testing is not routine. Methods: A case-control study was conducted using data captured from an electronic medical record in a large treatment program in Nigeria. Cases PLWH receiving cART who developed acquired drug resistance (ADR) and controls were those without ADR between 2004 and 2011. Each case was matched to up to 2 controls by sex, age, and education. Logistic regression was used estimate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for factors associated with ADR. Results: We evaluated 159 cases with ADR and 299 controls without ADR. In a multivariate model, factors associated with ADR included older age (OR = 2.35 [age 30-40 years 95% CI 1.29, 4.27], age 41 + years OR = 2.31 [95% CI 1.11, 4.84], compared to age 17-30), higher education level (secondary OR 2.14 [95% CI 1.1.11-4.13]), compared to primary and tertiary), non-adherence to care (OR = 2.48 [95% CI 1.50-4.00]), longer treatment duration (OR = 1.80 [95% CI 1.37-2.35]), lower CD4 count((OR = 0.95 [95% CI 0.95-0.97]) and higher viral load (OR = 1.97 [95% CI 1.44-2.54]). Conclusions: Understanding these predictors may guide programs in developing interventions to identify patients at risk of developing ADR and implementing prevention strategies.

show abstract

“…Treatment guidelines in resource-permitted settings advocate the use of HIVDR monitoring both prior to ART initiation and when treatment failure is suspected 1,2 . There is increasing evidence showing that the presence of minority resistance variants open Scientific RepoRtS | (2020) 10:1634 | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-58544-z www.nature.com/scientificreports www.nature.com/scientificreports/ (MRV) in the HIV quasispecies (i.e., a swarm of highly-related but genotypically different viral variants) may be clinically significant and increase the risk of virological failure, impair immune recovery, lead to accumulation of drug resistance, increase risk of treatment switches and death [3][4][5][6][7][8] . A nationwide study in Mexico focusing on pretreatment drug resistance (PDR) found that lowering the detection threshold for PDR to 5% versus the conventional 20% improved the ability to identify patients with virological failure 6 .…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Performance comparison of next generation sequencing analysis pipelines for HIV-1 drug resistance testing

Lee

Parkin

Jennings

et al. 2020

Sci Rep

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Next generation sequencing (NGS) is a trending new standard for genotypic HIV-1 drug resistance (HIVDR) testing. Many NGS HIVDR data analysis pipelines have been independently developed, each with variable outputs and data management protocols. Standardization of such analytical methods and comparison of available pipelines are lacking, yet may impact subsequent HIVDR interpretation and other downstream applications. Here we compared the performance of five NGS HIVDR pipelines using proficiency panel samples from NIAID Virology Quality Assurance (VQA) program. Ten VQA panel specimens were genotyped by each of six international laboratories using their own in-house NGS assays. Raw NGS data were then processed using each of the five different pipelines including HyDRA, MiCall, PASeq, Hivmmer and DEEPGEN. All pipelines detected amino acid variants (AAVs) at full range of frequencies (1~100%) and demonstrated good linearity as compared to the reference frequency values. While the sensitivity in detecting low abundance AAVs, with frequencies between 1~20%, is less a concern for all pipelines, their specificity dramatically decreased at AAV frequencies <2%, suggesting that 2% threshold may be a more reliable reporting threshold for ensured specificity in AAV calling and reporting. More variations were observed among the pipelines when low abundance AAVs are concerned, likely due to differences in their NGS read quality control strategies. Findings from this study highlight the need for standardized strategies for NGS HIVDR data analysis, especially for the detection of minority HiVDR variants.Genotypic HIV drug resistance (HIVDR) testing not only guides effective clinical care of HIV-infected patients but also serves to provide surveillance of transmitted HIVDR in the population. Treatment guidelines in resource-permitted settings advocate the use of HIVDR monitoring both prior to ART initiation and when treatment failure is suspected 1,2 . There is increasing evidence showing that the presence of minority resistance variants open Scientific RepoRtS | (2020) 10:1634 | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-58544-z www.nature.com/scientificreports www.nature.com/scientificreports/ (MRV) in the HIV quasispecies (i.e., a swarm of highly-related but genotypically different viral variants) may be clinically significant and increase the risk of virological failure, impair immune recovery, lead to accumulation of drug resistance, increase risk of treatment switches and death [3][4][5][6][7][8] . A nationwide study in Mexico focusing on pretreatment drug resistance (PDR) found that lowering the detection threshold for PDR to 5% versus the conventional 20% improved the ability to identify patients with virological failure 6 . In addition, a European wide study found that pre-existing minority drug-resistant HIV-1 variants more than doubled the risk of virological failure to first-line NNRTI-based ART 9 . A more recent African study also reported similar findings, suggesting lowering the threshold below 20% improved the ability to i...

show abstract

Pretreatment HIV Drug Resistance Increases Regimen Switches in Sub-Saharan Africa

Abstract: Given rising pretreatment HIV drug resistance levels in sub-Saharan Africa, these findings underscore the need for expanded access to second-line ART. VL monitoring can improve the accuracy of failure detection and efficiency of switching practices.

Cited by 48 publications

References 35 publications

Rates and Correlates of Short Term Virologic Response among Treatment-Naïve HIV-Infected Children Initiating Antiretroviral Therapy in Ethiopia: A Multi-Center Prospective Cohort Study

Rates and Correlates of Short Term Virologic Response among Treatment-Naïve HIV-Infected Children Initiating Antiretroviral Therapy in Ethiopia: A Multi-Center Prospective Cohort Study

Epidemiologic and viral predictors of antiretroviral drug resistance among persons living with HIV in a large treatment program in Nigeria

Performance comparison of next generation sequencing analysis pipelines for HIV-1 drug resistance testing

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About