2017
DOI: 10.1080/10242422.2017.1310206
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass using ultrasound aiming at obtaining fermentable sugar

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another study on the ultrasound pretreatment on sugar beet shreds followed by enzymatic hydrolysis resulted in a yield of 780 mg/g cellulose, which was 3.7 times higher than that of achieved with untreated samples (Ivetić et al, 2017). Luzzi et al (2017) represented an interesting work on pretreatment of LCB where they performed the ultrasonication treatment and enzymatic hydrolysis in a single step. The activity of cellulase enzyme was examined in terms of temperature, Ph, and ultrasound power and found the maximum yield of 15.5 UPFml −1 at 40 • C, pH 4.6 and applied power of 44 W. The optimum conditions further showed effective sugar production on enzymatic hydrolysis of filter paper and bagasse malt.…”
Section: Ultrasonicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another study on the ultrasound pretreatment on sugar beet shreds followed by enzymatic hydrolysis resulted in a yield of 780 mg/g cellulose, which was 3.7 times higher than that of achieved with untreated samples (Ivetić et al, 2017). Luzzi et al (2017) represented an interesting work on pretreatment of LCB where they performed the ultrasonication treatment and enzymatic hydrolysis in a single step. The activity of cellulase enzyme was examined in terms of temperature, Ph, and ultrasound power and found the maximum yield of 15.5 UPFml −1 at 40 • C, pH 4.6 and applied power of 44 W. The optimum conditions further showed effective sugar production on enzymatic hydrolysis of filter paper and bagasse malt.…”
Section: Ultrasonicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One possible reason for this could be due to all runs were performed with the same range of ultrasound power, since according to Luzzi et al. (2017) this parameter could promote a change in enzymes activities.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a 100‐mL beaker, the amount of malt bagasse (solid fraction) and enzyme (liquid fraction), defined from experimental design, was weighted and then the sodium acetate buffer was added until 10 g as liquid fraction was obtained. After well‐sealed, the samples were thermally treated: one assay in the ultrasonic bath with 30% as ultrasonic power and another assay in the thermostatic bath (Luzzi et al., 2017). Temperature, pH, and exposure time were defined according to previous studies (Leaes et al., 2013; Wang et al., 2012), considering 50°C in pH 4.8 during 480 min (8 h).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The different pretreatments include conventional methods, such as acid and alkaline hydrolysis under mechanical agitation (AG), steam explosion or oxidative treatments, and emerging techniques, such as microwaves, ozone, irradiation by gamma rays, supercritical CO2 or ultrasound application [10][11][12]. In this sense, the use of high-intensity ultrasound (US), characterized by operating at acoustic intensity higher than 1 W•cm -2 in the frequency range of 10-100 kHz, has shown itself to be an efficient tool for intensifying the treatment of biomass in combination with conventional processes [13][14][15][16]. Moreover, the application of US in an alternative primary pretreatment could enhance the sugar release using milder conditions in terms of temperature, type of acid or acid concentration [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%