“…Given the increased awareness of the importance of early diagnosis and intervention for children with autism spectrum disorders (ASD), gold standard diagnostic measures, such as the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule [Lord et al, ] and Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule‐2 (ADOS‐2 [Lord et al, ]), have become more accessible internationally for young children with ASD [Baird et al, ; Baron‐Cohen et al, ; Boilson, Staines, Ramirez, Posada, & Sweeney, ; Fombonne et al, ; Kim et al, ; Morales‐Hidalgo, Roigé‐Castellví, Hernández‐Martínez, Voltas, & Canals, ; Rudra et al, ; Sun, Allison, Matthews, et al, ]. The increased use of the ADOS‐G/ADOS‐2 in international studies has also been driven by the translation of the ADOS‐G/ADOS‐2 into more than 12 languages; however, studies examining the diagnostic validity of the measure have been mainly conducted in Western countries including the United States [Gotham, Risi, Pickles, & Lord, ], Canada [Risi et al, ], United Kingdom [Le Couteur, Haden, Hammal, & McConachie, ], the Netherlands [de Bildt et al, ], Germany [Bölte & Poustka, ], Poland [Chojnicka & Pisula, ], Greece [Papanikolaou et al, 2009], and Sweden [Zander, Sturm, & Bölte, ].…”