Prevalence and characteristics of ertapenem-mono-resistant isolates among carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales in China

Abstract

Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE), specifically those resistant to only ertapenem among carbapenems (ETP-mono-resistant), are increasingly reported, while the optimal therapy options remain uncertain. To investigate the prevalence and characteristics of ETP-mono-resistant CRE, CRE strains were systematically collected from 102 hospitals across China between 2018 and 2021. A 1:1 randomized matching study was conducted with ETP-mono-resistant strains to meropenem- and/or imipenem-resistant (MEM/IPM-resistant) strains. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing, whole-genome sequencing, carbapenem-hydrolysing activity and the expression of carbapenemase genes were determined. In total, 18.8% of CRE strains were ETP-mono-resistant, with relatively low ertapenem MIC values. ETP-mono-resistant strains exhibited enhanced susceptibility to β-lactams, β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations, levofloxacin, fosfomycin, amikacin and polymyxin than MEM/IPM-resistant strains ( P < 0.05). Phylogenetic analysis revealed high genetic diversity among ETP-mono-resistant strains. Extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs) and/or AmpC, as well as porin mutations, were identified as potential major mechanisms mediating ETP-mono-resistance, while the presence of carbapenemases was found to be the key factor distinguishing the carbapenem-resistant phenotypes between the two groups ( P < 0.001). Compared with the MEM/IPM-resistant group, limited carbapenemase-producing CRE (CP-CRE) strains in the ETP-mono-resistant group showed a significantly lower prevalence of ESBLs and porin mutations, along with reduced expression of carbapenemase. Remarkably, spot assays combined with modified carbapenem inactivation method indicated that ETP-mono-resistant CP-CRE isolates grew at meropenem concentrations eightfold above their corresponding MIC values, accompanied by rapidly enhanced carbapenem-hydrolysing ability. These findings illustrate that ETP-mono-resistant CRE strains are relatively prevalent and that caution should be exercised when using meropenem alone for treatment. The detection of carbapenemase should be prioritized.