2016
DOI: 10.18203/2349-3291.ijcp20161049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevalence and clinical profile of mycoplasma pneumoniae respiratory infection in children: a hospital based study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 10 publications
(12 reference statements)
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…About 90.32% cases belonged to age group <5 years and this age group also had a maximum number of positive cases which is in agreement with the epidemiological data based on serological studies [4,13]. Comparison of clinical signs and symptoms between M. pneumoniae-infected and non-infected patients revealed that fever, cough, hurried breathing, with signs of crepitations, intercostal and subcostal retractions were predominant findings in M. pneumoniae-positive patients (Table 1) and are comparable with findings of Chaudhry R et al, [14] Using a combination of PCR and serology, overall 31 of 133 patients included in the present study (23.3%) were found positive and the results are comparable with prevalence rate of 10-30% reported in different studies [14][15][16]. In the present study, maximum samples were positive by serology followed by PCR.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…About 90.32% cases belonged to age group <5 years and this age group also had a maximum number of positive cases which is in agreement with the epidemiological data based on serological studies [4,13]. Comparison of clinical signs and symptoms between M. pneumoniae-infected and non-infected patients revealed that fever, cough, hurried breathing, with signs of crepitations, intercostal and subcostal retractions were predominant findings in M. pneumoniae-positive patients (Table 1) and are comparable with findings of Chaudhry R et al, [14] Using a combination of PCR and serology, overall 31 of 133 patients included in the present study (23.3%) were found positive and the results are comparable with prevalence rate of 10-30% reported in different studies [14][15][16]. In the present study, maximum samples were positive by serology followed by PCR.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%