2017
DOI: 10.1080/15332640.2017.1288190
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevalence and correlates of arrests or stops for drunk driving on both sides of the U.S.-Mexico border

Abstract: Risk for driving under the influence of alcohol (DUI) may be higher in U.S. and Mexican border cities as compared to non-border cities in each country. We examine rates and correlates of self-reported DUI arrests or stops on both sides of the border, based on a large-scale survey of 4,796 Mexicans and Mexican Americans in border and non-border cities of Texas and two states in Mexico. Findings varied by site and country, and did not consistently show higher rates on the border. DUI prevention efforts should ta… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The main effect result for LERA’s distance to the border showing decreasing arrest rates as distances increase confirms the potential effect of the increased alcohol availability in the border area on DUI rates. Previous papers on self‐reported DUI arrest rates and police DUI stops in surveys in border and nonborder areas have used different methods and show contradictory results, with no differences between border and nonborder (Caetano et al, 2013) or higher rates in border areas (Wallisch et al, 2018). It is also possible that the higher DUI arrest rate closer to the border is an effect of increased police activity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The main effect result for LERA’s distance to the border showing decreasing arrest rates as distances increase confirms the potential effect of the increased alcohol availability in the border area on DUI rates. Previous papers on self‐reported DUI arrest rates and police DUI stops in surveys in border and nonborder areas have used different methods and show contradictory results, with no differences between border and nonborder (Caetano et al, 2013) or higher rates in border areas (Wallisch et al, 2018). It is also possible that the higher DUI arrest rate closer to the border is an effect of increased police activity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We then assess the extent to which larger Hispanic populations and distance from the California/Mexico border are related to DUI arrests across areas of the state over time. Alcohol outlet density has been positively associated with alcohol problems including DUI (Gruenewald et al, 2002; Saeed et al, 2019; Treno et al, 2003), and greater alcohol availability on the border has been associated with increased DUI behavior and arrest (Wallisch et al, 2018). We expect that distance to the border will be inversely related and alcohol outlet density directly related to DUI arrests.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These three factors that have been previously associated with DUI, a major risk factor for alcohol-involved MVCs (Caetano et al, 2020;Gruenewald et al, 2002;Wallisch et al, 2017) (Lange & Voas, 2000;Lange et al, 2002;Mills et al, 2014). Research evidence indicates that border residents have higher rates of binge drinking and alcoholrelated consequences than the population off the border (Caetano et al, 2012(Caetano et al, , 2021Zemore et al, 2016).…”
Section: Given the Public Health Importance Of Amvcs In The Unitedmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Second, this paper examines the extent to which the percent of Hispanics in census tracts populations, distance from census tracts to the California/Mexico border, and alcohol outlet density in census tracts are associated with rates of AMVCs. These three factors that have been previously associated with DUI, a major risk factor for alcohol‐involved MVCs (Caetano et al, 2020; Gruenewald et al, 2002; Wallisch et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%