2016
DOI: 10.1093/infdis/jiw505
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevalence and Correlates of Persistent HIV-1 RNA in Cerebrospinal Fluid During Antiretroviral Therapy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

5
56
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
5
56
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Though we did find associations between 2 CSF markers of myeloid immune activation (sCD14 and sCD163) and plasma viremia, in this cohort of continuously virally suppressed individuals, viral persistence does not appear to be a main driver of chronic immune activation within compartments, nor is the latter driving viral persistence. Other causes ticipants may be due to a number of factors (24). Given the fact that our cohort was enrolled and followed long-term within ACTG studies with documented viral suppression for numerous visits, it is likely that our cohort was more consistently well-suppressed than the participants in the CHARTER study who were identified by a single plasma HIV RNA less than or equal to 50 copies/mL.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Though we did find associations between 2 CSF markers of myeloid immune activation (sCD14 and sCD163) and plasma viremia, in this cohort of continuously virally suppressed individuals, viral persistence does not appear to be a main driver of chronic immune activation within compartments, nor is the latter driving viral persistence. Other causes ticipants may be due to a number of factors (24). Given the fact that our cohort was enrolled and followed long-term within ACTG studies with documented viral suppression for numerous visits, it is likely that our cohort was more consistently well-suppressed than the participants in the CHARTER study who were identified by a single plasma HIV RNA less than or equal to 50 copies/mL.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, numerous recent trials have evaluated the use of two‐drug regimens to reduce toxicities, both in treatment‐naïve and in pretreated patients. The benefits of switching to an NRTI‐sparing regimen from E/C/F/TAF must be balanced against potential detriments: disruption of the single‐tablet regimen and increases in the number of pills and drug intake , changes in lipid parameters that may necessitate additional monitoring or treatment, persistence of viral replication in reservoir sites such as the central nervous system (CNS) , and absence of activity against hepatitis B virus (HBV). Only randomized clinical trials can definitively assess safety and efficacy differences between E/C/F/TAF and NRTI‐sparing regimens.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the current study, CSF sMAC was more likely to be detectable in HIV+ individuals compared to HIV negative individuals, even when only including HIV+ individuals on suppressive cART with negative hepatitis and syphilis tests. With recent research demonstrating that CSF HIV RNA is detectable by single copy assay in >40% of individuals on suppressive cART, it is possible that sMAC upregulation could be driven by very low levels of HIV that are not detectable with standard assays (Anderson et al, 2017). Alternatively, systemic sMAC elevation in the setting of HIV could be influenced by microbial gut translocation, which occurs in HIV-infected individuals and appears to be at least in part responsible for the immune activation that occurs despite cART (Brenchley et al, 2006).…”
Section: Discussion With Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%