2019
DOI: 10.1186/s12889-018-6355-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevalence and correlates of psychological distress among 13–14 year old adolescent girls in North Karnataka, South India: a cross-sectional study

Abstract: BackgroundMental health disorders among adolescents have emerged as a major public health issue in many low and middle-income countries, including India. There is a paucity of research on the determinants of psychological distress, particularly among the poorest girls in the poorest communities. The purpose of this study was to assess the prevalence and correlates of different indicators of psychological distress among 13–14 year old low caste girls in rural, south India.MethodsCross-sectional survey of 1191 l… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
37
1
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
5
37
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Several social-environmental factors (parental disrespect of privacy and in unadjusted analysis passive smoking, low peer support, low parental support, experience of hunger and school truancy) were found to be associated with WISD. These results are consistent with various previous investigations [ 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 ] and call for programmes improving parental and peer support.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Several social-environmental factors (parental disrespect of privacy and in unadjusted analysis passive smoking, low peer support, low parental support, experience of hunger and school truancy) were found to be associated with WISD. These results are consistent with various previous investigations [ 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 ] and call for programmes improving parental and peer support.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Psychosocial distresses associated with WISD or psychological distress may include loneliness [ 12 ], having no close friends [ 13 ], interpersonal violence [ 13 ], and bullying victimization [ 12 ]. Socio-environmental factors associated with WISD or psychological distress, may include experience of hunger [ 14 ], low peer and low parental support [ 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 ] and school truancy [ 15 ]. Health risk behaviours associated with WISD or psychological distress, may include substance use [ 14 , 17 , 18 ], sedentary behaviour [ 8 , 19 ], frequent fast food consumption [ 20 ], frequent soft drink intake [ 20 ], fast food intake and sedentary behaviour [ 21 ], sexual behaviour [ 14 ] and injury [ 19 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They were sex, age, grade, alcohol use, bullied, physically attacked, truancy, ever smoked, the number of close friends, engaged in a fight, parental or guardian supervision, getting help from friends, physical activity, parental connectedness, experience of hunger, and parental bonding. The coding and selection of these variables were based on previous studies [11,19,23,24] and their availability in the GSHS dataset. Detailed descriptions of the variables and coding are presented in Table 1.…”
Section: Explanatory Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These expectations incline them toward psychosocial distress. Psychosocial distress is an emotional state or mood characterised by the feeling of loneliness, sadness, anxiety, suicidal ideation, and self-consciousness [11]. Suicide, for instance, is the third leading cause of death in adolescents 15-19 years old [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Self-efficacy and activism were previously defined at trial baseline, and were derived using PCA and internal consistency analyses on responses to seven item and three item scales, respectively. 15 Both scales used a three-point likert type response choice (Agree/ somewhat agree/ do not agree). The Chronbach's Alpha for the responses to the 7 item self-efficacy scale and the 3-item speaking out against gender disadavantage scale were 0.67 and 0.78, respectively.…”
Section: Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%