2020
DOI: 10.20546/ijcmas.2020.907.116
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevalence and detection of Subclinical Mastitis by California Mastitis Test (CMT) in Dairy Farms of Theni District in Tamil Nadu, India

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A significant difference was observed within the group (p<0.05) CMT test was performed in accordance with guidelines established by National Mastitis Council, highest SCM prevalence was recorded in Jalaun district (30.77%) followed by 25.97 and 21.05 per cent, respectively for Jhansi and Lalitpur. Our results are in agreement with studies done by different authors in various parts of the country (Senthilkumar et al, 2020;Karabasanavar et al 2019;Swami et al, 2017). Results produced with CMT may differ from SCC-based prevalence determination (Iraguha et al 2017).…”
Section: Somatic Cell Count (Scc) Estimationsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…A significant difference was observed within the group (p<0.05) CMT test was performed in accordance with guidelines established by National Mastitis Council, highest SCM prevalence was recorded in Jalaun district (30.77%) followed by 25.97 and 21.05 per cent, respectively for Jhansi and Lalitpur. Our results are in agreement with studies done by different authors in various parts of the country (Senthilkumar et al, 2020;Karabasanavar et al 2019;Swami et al, 2017). Results produced with CMT may differ from SCC-based prevalence determination (Iraguha et al 2017).…”
Section: Somatic Cell Count (Scc) Estimationsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…In this study the seroprevalence of PPR infection among sex groups was 66.45% in females and 32.39% in males. This relative seroprevalence variation was statistically significant, which means being female animals are more likely to develop PPR virus infection as compared to male animals (P = 0.000) and this study finding is consistent with previous studies [27,31,44,45]. In the current study, the higher prevalence in females than in males may be due to physiological differences where females reveal some degree of predominance infection as a result of production and reproduction stress which makes females more prone to infection [25].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…In Pakistan, the prevalence of SCM in cows ranged from 17 to 81%. The most used diagnostic method for SCM was the Surf Field Mastitis Test (SFMT), which is a derivative of the CMT, a reasonable diagnostic method (Senthilkumar et al 2020). The large variation between studies could be due to the differences in the risk factors present in the farms or could be caused by selection bias.…”
Section: Prevalence Of Subclinical Mastitismentioning
confidence: 99%