2004
DOI: 10.1038/sj.jhh.1001672
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevalence and determinants of undertreatment of hypertension in the Netherlands

Abstract: The objective of this study was to determine the prevalence, treatment, and control of hypertension, and the determinants of undertreatment in the Dutch population. The study design was cross-sectional. A population-based survey on cardiovascular disease risk factors in the Netherlands from 1996 to 2002 was the setting of the study. A total of 10 820 men and women, aged 30-59 years, were included in the study. The main outcome measures of the study were: Prevalence of hypertension, treatment, and control of hy… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
30
1
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
4
30
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, only one in every five patients received an add-on therapy in the first year of treatment. This confirms the findings from previous studies showing that hypertension is undertreated in The Netherlands [23,24]. Moreover, 30% of all newly treated patients discontinued treatment in the first year, which is similar to results from other studies [15][16][17].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…However, only one in every five patients received an add-on therapy in the first year of treatment. This confirms the findings from previous studies showing that hypertension is undertreated in The Netherlands [23,24]. Moreover, 30% of all newly treated patients discontinued treatment in the first year, which is similar to results from other studies [15][16][17].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…15 The prevalence of 17% hypertension in our study is markedly higher than the 3.7% prevalence of hypertension in the general population of Dutch women between 30 and 39 years. 16 Adding the excluded women who remained hypertensive after the preeclamptic index pregnancy (47/386; 12%)) the overall prevalence of hypertension after preeclampsia is comparable with the mean prevalence of 30% to 40% found in other studies in formerly preeclampsia women. 6,[17][18][19][20] Our data show that a substantial proportion of women progressed within a few years from normotension to hypertension.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…The primary outcome was the odds of the occurrence of hypertension in idiopathic hyperCKemia, compared to population controls. Hypertension was defined as current systolic pressure ≥ 140 mm Hg, or diastolic pressure ≥ 90 mm Hg, both without established cause (primary hypertension), or the use of antihypertensive medication for primary hypertension, according to international guidelines [12,15,22]. Sample size calculations for the primary outcome measure were based on the assumption that hypertension occurs twice as often with hyperCKemia as in the general population [5,8].…”
Section: ■ Study Population and Clinical Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%