2010
DOI: 10.1007/bf03262714
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevalence and Diagnosis of Molar-Incisor-Hypomineralisation (MIH): A systematic review

Abstract: Further standardization of study design and methods is needed to make the results comparable.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

16
238
1
42

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 287 publications
(297 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
16
238
1
42
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the results of epidemiological studies from different countries are not directly comparable because of variations in criteria, sample selection, lesions included, and aetiological and environmental factors, the prevalence of MIH in this study (24%) fell within the wide range of values (2.8-40.2%) reported in the literature (14). However, the sample examined in this study comprised a small population of children attending our department for dental care.…”
Section: Prevalence Of Mihmentioning
confidence: 57%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Although the results of epidemiological studies from different countries are not directly comparable because of variations in criteria, sample selection, lesions included, and aetiological and environmental factors, the prevalence of MIH in this study (24%) fell within the wide range of values (2.8-40.2%) reported in the literature (14). However, the sample examined in this study comprised a small population of children attending our department for dental care.…”
Section: Prevalence Of Mihmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…Previous studies have explained this finding with reference to the likelihood that an erupted tooth with MIH will deteriorate quickly; thus, fewer teeth with moderate or severe MIH are typically detected (3,14,17).…”
Section: Clinical Characteristics Of Mihmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…3,4,5 The prevalence of MIH has been studied extensively and it varies greatly from 2.4% in Germany and Bulgaria to 40.2% in Brazil. 6 The condition shows no gender predilection and the maxillary teeth, most specifically the molars, are most commonly affected. 7 The FPMs may not be affected to the same degree in an individual and some molars could be relatively unaffected.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%