2018
DOI: 10.4103/npmj.npmj_34_18
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevalence and impact of abnormal routine pre-operative test results among elective surgical patients with or without co-morbidity: An observational comparative study

Abstract: Co-morbid patients have more abnormal results than non-co-morbid patients, but impacts of such tests are nearly indifferent. Routine testing is not favourable even in co-morbid patients. Selective or co-morbid disease-specific tests are having more significant impacts and should replace the 'routine testing' even in co-morbid patients.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Notably, most abnormal test results in routine preoperative tests do not change anaesthesia management 1 11-13 , even in oncological and older patients 14,15 . However, laboratory tests specific to the patient’s comorbid condition has an impact in changing the anaesthesia management 16 . Fourth, it reiterates that routine preoperative investigations are unnecessary and does not contribute to patient safety.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notably, most abnormal test results in routine preoperative tests do not change anaesthesia management 1 11-13 , even in oncological and older patients 14,15 . However, laboratory tests specific to the patient’s comorbid condition has an impact in changing the anaesthesia management 16 . Fourth, it reiterates that routine preoperative investigations are unnecessary and does not contribute to patient safety.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%