1986
DOI: 10.1159/000118254
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevalence and Incidence of Senile and Multi-Infarct Dementia in the Lundby Study: A Comparison between the Time Periods 1947–1957 and 1957–1972

Abstract: In a recent Lundby paper, based on the original 1947 Lundby cohort [Hagnell et al., 1983], we reported a diminishing trend in the incidence of both senile and multi-infarct dementia from the first period of study 1947–1957 to the second, 1957–1972. In the present study we use the total Lundby population, including those who entered the Lundby project in 1957, as a basis for our calculations. The findings indicate no statistically significant changes in the prevalence and incidence of senile and multi-infarct d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
50
0
3

Year Published

1989
1989
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 105 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
6
50
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, we believe the two stage model of disease progression used here, produces useful estimates of the numbers of patients requiring a high level of care roughly equivalent to that provided by a health care facility such as a nursing home. Epidemiological surveys of the percentage of cases with severe disease have ranged between 2% to over 50% (14)(15)(16). Such wide variation could result either from differences in survey methodology and diagnostic criteria, or sampling enrollment biases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, we believe the two stage model of disease progression used here, produces useful estimates of the numbers of patients requiring a high level of care roughly equivalent to that provided by a health care facility such as a nursing home. Epidemiological surveys of the percentage of cases with severe disease have ranged between 2% to over 50% (14)(15)(16). Such wide variation could result either from differences in survey methodology and diagnostic criteria, or sampling enrollment biases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some articles reported that the incidence or prevalence remained stable over time. [3][4][5][6][7] One article reported a decline in rates, 8 while others suggested that rates increased. 9-12 These increases were particularly large when the analyses used cases identified through the Medicare system.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Lundby study in Sweden 13 reported no significant change in the prevalence or incidence of either multiinfarct dementia or what was described at the time as "senile dementia" (now most probably AD) over the period from 1947 to 1972. In Rochester in the USA, 14 the meticulously maintained healthcare register suggested no change in the prevalence of either AD or dementia between 1975 and 1980.…”
Section: Variations In Dementia Prevalence Between Countriesmentioning
confidence: 98%