2017
DOI: 10.1038/srep44110
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevalence and magnitude of groundwater use by vegetation: a global stable isotope meta-analysis

Abstract: The role of groundwater as a resource in sustaining terrestrial vegetation is widely recognized. But the global prevalence and magnitude of groundwater use by vegetation is unknown. Here we perform a meta-analysis of plant xylem water stable isotope (δ2H and δ18O, n = 7367) information from 138 published papers – representing 251 genera, and 414 species of angiosperms (n = 376) and gymnosperms (n = 38). We show that the prevalence of groundwater use by vegetation (defined as the number of samples out of a univ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

8
112
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 129 publications
(122 citation statements)
references
References 183 publications
8
112
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, compared with shallow roots in the upper 1‐m soil layer, deep root systems are poorly understood and characterized (Pierret et al, ). We lack understanding of how their depth and distribution relates to the infiltration depth of storm rainfall (Fan et al, ) and how they control the source apportionment of forest transpiration (Evaristo, Jasechko, & McDonnell, ; Evaristo & McDonnell, ). Recent work by Zhang, Evaristo, Li, Si, and McDonnell () has related deep rooting profiles to the age of extracted soil water by tree xylem water.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, compared with shallow roots in the upper 1‐m soil layer, deep root systems are poorly understood and characterized (Pierret et al, ). We lack understanding of how their depth and distribution relates to the infiltration depth of storm rainfall (Fan et al, ) and how they control the source apportionment of forest transpiration (Evaristo, Jasechko, & McDonnell, ; Evaristo & McDonnell, ). Recent work by Zhang, Evaristo, Li, Si, and McDonnell () has related deep rooting profiles to the age of extracted soil water by tree xylem water.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Groundwater serves as an important resource for plant growth, survival, and distribution in these areas (Evaristo & McDonnell, 2017;Miller, Chen, Rubin, Ma, & Baldocchi, 2010;Stromberg, Tluczek, Hazelton, & Ajami, 2010). Groundwater serves as an important resource for plant growth, survival, and distribution in these areas (Evaristo & McDonnell, 2017;Miller, Chen, Rubin, Ma, & Baldocchi, 2010;Stromberg, Tluczek, Hazelton, & Ajami, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, the effects of different mixing models on the interpretation of source apportionment results are poorly understood. But quantifying the contributions from various sources in the subsurface (i.e., source proportions) is needed given the growing interest in the role of groundwater as a water source for vegetation in the Critical Zone (Evaristo & McDonnell, ; Fan, ). While recent work (Evaristo, Jasechko, & McDonnell, ; Good, Noone, & Bowen, ; Zhang, Evaristo, Li, Si, & McDonnell, ) has provided evidence for ecohydrological separation (Brooks, Barnard, Coulombe, & McDonnell, ; McDonnell, ) whereby plants appear to use water of a character different to mobile water found in soils, groundwater, and streams, methods used for quantifying the contribution of groundwater to xylem water have yet to be critically examined.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In early, mostly pre‐2000s era studies when the cost of isotope analysis was prohibitive, the use of either δ 2 H or δ 18 O (“single isotope ratio”) in most of the aforementioned approaches was deemed sufficient. As the cost of isotope analysis decreased, analysing for isotopes of both H and O (“dual isotope ratio”) rapidly became the norm (see Evaristo & McDonnell, ). Consequently, the insights from H and O information, in the context of plant source water research, did not always reinforce each other.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%