2023
DOI: 10.1186/s13018-023-03508-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevalence and morbidity of neck pain: a cross-sectional study of 3000 elderly men

Abstract: Background The purpose of this study is to determine the prevalence and morbidity of neck pain with or without cervical rhizopathy, upper extremity motor deficit and/or thoracolumbar pain in elderly men. Methods We conducted a cross-sectional questionnaire study of 3,000 community-dwelling older men with a mean age of 75.4 ± 3.2 years (range 69–81) to determine if they had experienced neck pain with or without cervical rhizopathy/upper extremity mo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 29 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The prolonged presence of pain beyond the initial phase of the injury will increase the likelihood that the pain will become sub-acute and lead to chronic widespread pain syndromes (CWPS) and other disabling spine conditions [ 27 ]. NP alone significantly contributes to the GBD and combined injuries from MVC that cause NP [ 28 ]. Migraine HAs, radicular pain with weakness, and sleep disturbances would only complicate an already complex clinical algorithm needed to best treat the patient [ 29 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The prolonged presence of pain beyond the initial phase of the injury will increase the likelihood that the pain will become sub-acute and lead to chronic widespread pain syndromes (CWPS) and other disabling spine conditions [ 27 ]. NP alone significantly contributes to the GBD and combined injuries from MVC that cause NP [ 28 ]. Migraine HAs, radicular pain with weakness, and sleep disturbances would only complicate an already complex clinical algorithm needed to best treat the patient [ 29 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%