“…The low national prevalence could be attributed to the availability and access of these methods as suggested by the proportion of health facilities in Kenya offering IUCD, implants, female, and male sterilization to be 75%, 58%, 7%, and 5%, respectively [ 20 ], or other factor related reason, opposition to use, lack of knowledge, and method related reasons; lack of trained providers and wide availability of short-acting methods in the rural areas [ 21 ]. Previous studies associated the use of LAPM with the number of living children [ 22 , 23 ], having three or more children [ 22 , 24 – 27 ], area of residence [ 22 ], region [ 22 , 28 , 29 ], woman’s age [ 22 , 23 , 28 , 29 ], education levels [ 23 , 27 , 28 , 30 – 32 ], wealth status [ 23 – 25 , 28 , 31 ], joint decision making on family planning use with partner [ 33 , 34 ], no desire for more children [ 30 ], and level of knowledge on LAPMs [ 26 , 32 ]. While determinants of LAPM have been documents in several programs implemented in diverse settings to promote utilization, there remain a need to understand prevalence and determinants in the rural Kenyan context.…”