2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2021.04.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevalence and Predictors of Missed Dysplasia on Index Barrett’s Esophagus Diagnosing Endoscopy in a Veteran Population

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Post-endoscopy incident oesophageal cancer is estimated to account for 14% of the oesophageal cancer burden 21 and missed dysplasia at index endoscopy accounts for around 10% of cancer cases. 22 , 23 In a randomised crossover trial with two endoscopies performed 6 weeks apart (in 153 patients) to assess the utility of confocal endomicroscopy, inconspicuous dysplasia was missed by the standard white-light Seattle protocol in approximately 50% of cases. 24 Low-grade dysplasia is, however, prone to overdiagnosis unless diagnosed by consensus.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Post-endoscopy incident oesophageal cancer is estimated to account for 14% of the oesophageal cancer burden 21 and missed dysplasia at index endoscopy accounts for around 10% of cancer cases. 22 , 23 In a randomised crossover trial with two endoscopies performed 6 weeks apart (in 153 patients) to assess the utility of confocal endomicroscopy, inconspicuous dysplasia was missed by the standard white-light Seattle protocol in approximately 50% of cases. 24 Low-grade dysplasia is, however, prone to overdiagnosis unless diagnosed by consensus.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We aimed to determine the effect of endoscopy duration on dysplasia detection. Both endoscopist experience [18,19] and BE length [20] have been shown to influence dysplasia detection. These factors may also impact endoscopy duration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The percentage of squamous epithelium that fails to mature at the epithelium’s interface is termed low-grade dysplasia (LGD)/CIN I, high-grade dysplasia (HGD)/CIN II, as well as CIN III and additional CIS ( 7 ). Early detection and diagnosis of this cancer form are crucial for effective treatment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%