1998
DOI: 10.1136/oem.55.10.668
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevalence and predictors of work related respiratory symptoms in workers exposed to organic dusts.

Abstract: Objectives-The aims of this study were to document the prevalence of work related upper and lower respiratory tract symptoms in workers exposed to organic dusts and to identify variables predictive of their occurrence. Methods-A cross sectional survey with an administered questionnaire (a previously validated adaptation of the Medical Research Council (MRC) respiratory questionnaire) was performed. Symptoms were classified as work related by their periodicity. Demographic data, smoking habits, and occupational… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
65
2
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
5
65
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These findings are in agreement with previous studies pointing to a low prevalence of UAS, which are thought to be allergic [14][15][16], and to a high prevalence of farm work-induced UAS in animal farmers [15,16,19,20]. This study extends the findings of previous studies by confirming the allergic nature of these symptoms, since skin tests were also carried out.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These findings are in agreement with previous studies pointing to a low prevalence of UAS, which are thought to be allergic [14][15][16], and to a high prevalence of farm work-induced UAS in animal farmers [15,16,19,20]. This study extends the findings of previous studies by confirming the allergic nature of these symptoms, since skin tests were also carried out.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Table 5. -Adjusted odds ratios (95% confidence interval) for upper airway symptoms (UAS) with respect to farming characteristics been shown to correlate with high exposure to dust, endotoxin and fungal spores [19,20]. Therefore, it seems probable that work-induced UAS in farmers result from exposure to many different inducers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other airborne bacteria in breeding facilities may be defined as environmental bacteria; they have not been mentioned in the quoted regulation of the Minister of Health, and it is hardly probable that they could induce diseases. However, we should remember that Gram-negative bacteria even from environmental group may be a source of endotoxins inducing immunotoxic reactions in people [8,[14][15][16]18]. The number of samples collected in our study was limited; therefore, it would not be reasonable to generalize our conclusions about differences in bioaerosol concentrations in poultry houses.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 39%
“…The bacterial aerosol consists of staphylococci, streptococci, numerous Gram-positive and Gram-negative rod-shaped bacteria, including Bacillus genus [4,5,[7][8][9][10][11][12][13]. Both live cells and their components (endotoxins in case of Gramnegative bacteria) may induce in poultry breeding employees a number of symptoms and diseases, mainly within the respiratory tract, as well as the toxic syndrome induced by endotoxins found in the organic dust [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21]. The degree of hazardousness of airborne bioaerosol particles in breeding facilities depends not only on the pathogenicity of microorganisms or toxicity of their products but also on the particle size which determines their ability to penetrate the human respiratory tract.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the lack of evidence for a correlation between quantity of airborne aerobic bacteria and disease incidence, there has been substantial research suggesting that increasing airborne aerobic bacterial load can impair immunity, retard growth and lower the productivity of animals (Simpson et al, 1998). In the current study, the concentration of airborne aerobic bacteria inside the enclosed-type rabbit shed was calculated to be between 2.11-6.36×10 4 colony forming unit (CFU)/m 3 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%