2012
DOI: 10.1590/s2237-60892012000300007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevalence and profile of daily smokers seen at three primary health care units in Pelotas, southern Brazil

Abstract: Prevalência e perfil dos fumantes diários usuários de três unidades básicas de saúde de Pelotas, sul do Brasil Prevalence and profile of daily smokers seen at three primary health care units in Pelotas, southern Brazil Abstract Objectives: To estimate the prevalence of daily smoking among users of three primary health care units affiliated with a university hospital in the municipality of Pelotas, southern Brazil, and to identify factors associated with daily tobacco consumption.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
9
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
9
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Many professionals proceeded to the implementation of ASSIST and among them, we highlight different health professionals (53.8%) (5,7,10,(17)(18)(19)21,(23)(24)(25)(26)28,(31)(32) , followed by trained individuals named as interviewers (34.6%) (2,6,8,11,20,22,27,33) , and researchers (authors), which corresponded to 11,5% (9,16,25) . Regarding the database which the studies were obtained, 34.6% (5,7,11,(16)(17)(18)21,23,26) were from PubMed, followed by the CAPES Journal Portal with 26.9% (2,20,22,25,(31)(32)(33) , SciELO with 19.2% (19,24,(27)(28)(29) , LILACS with 15.4% (6,8,9,…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Many professionals proceeded to the implementation of ASSIST and among them, we highlight different health professionals (53.8%) (5,7,10,(17)(18)(19)21,(23)(24)(25)(26)28,(31)(32) , followed by trained individuals named as interviewers (34.6%) (2,6,8,11,20,22,27,33) , and researchers (authors), which corresponded to 11,5% (9,16,25) . Regarding the database which the studies were obtained, 34.6% (5,7,11,(16)(17)(18)21,23,26) were from PubMed, followed by the CAPES Journal Portal with 26.9% (2,20,22,25,(31)(32)(33) , SciELO with 19.2% (19,24,(27)(28)(29) , LILACS with 15.4% (6,8,9,…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…This IRL shows that 34.6% (5,7,11,(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21) of the studies came from the PubMed database, followed by CAPES Journals with 26.9% (2,(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26) , SciELO with 19.2% (19,24,(27)(28)(29) , Lilacs, with 15.4% (6,(8)(9)30) and Medline, with 3.8% (10) , 19 studies were duplicated in these databases. After selection, 26 studies were intended for analysis.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations