2012
DOI: 10.1007/s11764-012-0234-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevalence and prognostic effect of sarcopenia in breast cancer survivors: the HEAL Study

Abstract: Purpose This study aimed to determine the prevalence of sarcopenia and examine whether sarcopenia was associated with overall and breast-cancer-specific mortality in a cohort of women diagnosed with breast cancer (stages I–IIIA). Methods A total of 471 breast cancer patients from western Washington State and New Mexico who participated in the prospective Health, Eating, Activity, and Lifestyle Study were included in this study. Appendicular lean mass was measured using dual X-ray absorptiometry scans at stud… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

10
173
0
24

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 242 publications
(207 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
10
173
0
24
Order By: Relevance
“…19,23,37,46 The relationship between increased muscle mass and disease-free survival has even been observed in oncological patients who have not undergone any cancer surgery. 13,16,24,38,44,50,55 This is a notable observation, as current methodologies for predicting oncological outcomes rely solely on histological grade of the malignancy and its TNM Classification of Malignant Tumors (TNM). Identifying more accurate and specific markers of survival would enable oncologists to discern which patients are appropriate candidates for a particular treatment, be it chemotherapy, radiation, surgery, or palliation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…19,23,37,46 The relationship between increased muscle mass and disease-free survival has even been observed in oncological patients who have not undergone any cancer surgery. 13,16,24,38,44,50,55 This is a notable observation, as current methodologies for predicting oncological outcomes rely solely on histological grade of the malignancy and its TNM Classification of Malignant Tumors (TNM). Identifying more accurate and specific markers of survival would enable oncologists to discern which patients are appropriate candidates for a particular treatment, be it chemotherapy, radiation, surgery, or palliation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a prospective study of BC survivors (HEAL study) a remarkable prevalence of sarcopenia (about 16%), independently of body fat mass, resulted to be a predictor of poor survival. In fact, in this study sarcopenic women had a threefold increased chance of dying from any cause and twofold increased chance of dying from BC related causes, compared to non sarcopenic women (22). In BC patients we do not simply have to face the consequences of bone loss related morbidity and mortality, but we have to keep in mind that even muscle mass damage can have the same impact (22).…”
Section: -Diagnostic Densitometric T-score Values (Femoral Neck and Lmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…In fact, in this study sarcopenic women had a threefold increased chance of dying from any cause and twofold increased chance of dying from BC related causes, compared to non sarcopenic women (22). In BC patients we do not simply have to face the consequences of bone loss related morbidity and mortality, but we have to keep in mind that even muscle mass damage can have the same impact (22). Also, weakening in muscular strength may result in increased incidence of falls.…”
Section: -Diagnostic Densitometric T-score Values (Femoral Neck and Lmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…While diet change to reduce calories and fat has been shown to be highly effi cacious in inducing relatively long-term weight loss , it does so at the expense of muscle loss (Mason et al 2013a , b ). This is a signifi cant issue for cancer survivors, who have a high prevalence of sarcopenia, among both obese and non-obese survivors, and sarcopenia has been associated with poorer prognosis (Villasenor et al 2012 ). In non-cancer populations, exercise aids with weight loss maintenance (Miller et al 2013 ), and somewhat with weight loss effi cacy (FosterSchubert et al 2012 ).…”
Section: Possible Adverse Effects Of Purposeful Weight Loss In Cancermentioning
confidence: 99%