2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.07.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevalence and Prognostic Significance of PTEN Loss in African-American and European-American Men Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy

Abstract: African-American (AA) men have a higher risk of lethal prostate cancer (PCa) compared to European-American (EA) men. However, the molecular basis of this difference, if any, remains unclear. In EA PCa, PTEN loss, but not ERG rearrangement, has been associated with poor outcomes in most studies. Although ERG rearrangement is less common in AA compared to EA PCa, the relative frequency of PTEN loss and the association of PTEN/ERG molecular subtypes with outcomes is unknown for AA PCa. We examined PTEN/ERG status… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
73
1
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
6
73
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous analyses also suggest that PTEN is less commonly deleted in cohorts of men of African ancestry (2,38). Our data suggest that alteration of the PI3K signaling pathway either through PTEN deletion or PIK3CA mutation is a less common event in AAPC.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Previous analyses also suggest that PTEN is less commonly deleted in cohorts of men of African ancestry (2,38). Our data suggest that alteration of the PI3K signaling pathway either through PTEN deletion or PIK3CA mutation is a less common event in AAPC.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Most of these cohorts have been previously described, and notably many were created to enrich for adverse oncologic outcomes, so they do not represent an unbiased survey of a radical prostatectomy population. In brief, these consisted of: 1) A cohort of consecutive tumors at radical prostatectomy from 2000–2004, including all tumors with Gleason score >6 (n=462 samples) (31); 2) A cohort of high-grade (Gleason score 9/10) tumors at radical prostatectomy from 1998–2005, designed for comparison to high-grade urothelial carcinomas (n=28) (32); 3) A cohort of all radical prostatectomies from 2004–2014 with primary Gleason pattern 5 and available clinical follow-up (n=71); 4) A cohort of African-American radical prostatectomy samples from 2005–2010, all with Gleason score 4+3=7 and higher (n=84) (31); 5) A cohort of patients who all developed metastatic disease and were treated with abiraterone/enzalutamide after radical prostatectomy at Johns Hopkins from 1995–2011 (n=34); 6) A cohort of patients with ductal adenocarcinoma and/or cribriform Gleason score 8 adenocarcinoma at radical prostatectomy from 1984–2004 (n=46) (33); 7) A case-cohort study of men undergoing radical prostatectomy from 1992–2009 who subsequently developed metastatic disease (n=325) (34); and 8) A cohort of men with biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy from 1992–2009 (n=240) (35). 9) Finally, a separate cohort of 43 neuroendocrine prostate carcinomas (NEPC) with confirmed small cell carcinoma histology on TMA was also queried by MSH2 IHC (36).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of the selected articles, the analyzed materials in the studies were: specimens from prostatectomies (10 studies) ( 27 , 28 , 34 , 38 , 46 49 , 60 , 64 ), biopsies (6 studies) ( 28 , 29 , 35 , 37 39 ), and TUR (3 studies) ( 34 , 38 , 69 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%