2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.burns.2019.02.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevalence and Risk Factors for Hypertrophic Scarring of Split Thickness Autograft Donor Sites in a Pediatric Burn Population

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…48 The dHACM results describing time to healing and complications with HTS/contractures were compared with results from previously described STSG studies. [49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56] The time to healing for dHACM on average was less than STSG, as it took 15-21 days to heal the various depths of burns while STSG took on average >21 days, as demonstrated in Table 5. The rates of HTS and contractures of dHACM grafts were compared with eight representative studies describing STSG.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…48 The dHACM results describing time to healing and complications with HTS/contractures were compared with results from previously described STSG studies. [49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56] The time to healing for dHACM on average was less than STSG, as it took 15-21 days to heal the various depths of burns while STSG took on average >21 days, as demonstrated in Table 5. The rates of HTS and contractures of dHACM grafts were compared with eight representative studies describing STSG.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The literature was reviewed for time to healing of STSG based on depth of burn wound. [48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55] These results were tabularized, and were compared with rates of healing for dHACM grafts dependent on depth of burn wound.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While morbidities such as pain and scars are common, the infection rate seems to be low [113]. Almost no findings are available on the prevalence of hypertrophic scars associated with donor site [114,115]. According to retrospective analyses, 34% of reviewed patients were affected by persistent hypertrophic scarring [114].…”
Section: The Curse Of Donor Site Morbiditymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When looking at the risk factors that lead to pathologic scarring after burn injury, the exhaustive multivariate review of 703 patients by Gangemi et al [7] reveals that female sex, younger age, burn sites on the neck or upper limbs, multiple surgical procedures, and meshed skin grafts were independent risk factors that contributed to increased incidence. In pediatric burn injury, Rotatori et al [8] reviewed 237 patients and found an astounding 64% with HTS. Specific risk factors for HTS included Hispanic ethnicity, increased total burn area, increased depth of injury, and increased percentage of burn requiring skin autografting.…”
Section: Epidemiology Of Scarring After Burn Injurymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specific risk factors for HTS included Hispanic ethnicity, increased total burn area, increased depth of injury, and increased percentage of burn requiring skin autografting. Risk factors involved in developing donor site HTS were increased time of epithelialization, increased depth of skin harvest, and thigh as the anatomical donor [8] .…”
Section: Epidemiology Of Scarring After Burn Injurymentioning
confidence: 99%