“…1 , Table 1 ). In our review, some national surveys assessed the prevalence of diabetes via population representative samples [ 33 , 36 , 38 , 40 , 42 – 44 , 47 , 49 , 55 , 60 , 61 , 65 , 66 , 68 , 72 , 85 – 87 , 89 , 91 , 96 , 98 , 105 , 107 ] and used similar population sampling methods (e.g., multi-stage, clustered, probabilistic sampling), whereas other studies focused on specific geographic regions or communities [ 34 , 35 , 37 , 45 , 46 , 48 – 54 , 56 – 58 , 63 , 67 , 73 – 75 , 77 , 82 – 84 , 92 – 95 , 102 , 110 – 112 ], recruited participants from clinical settings [ 51 , 59 , 62 , 69 , 95 ], or focused on specific age groups [ 37 , 42 , 56 – 58 , 75 , 109 , 112 ]. Also, the age range of the population surveyed—and consequently, age-adjustment estimates—varied among surveys.…”