Dear Sir,The paradigm shift that has occurred in the last decade attributing most, if not all, cervical cancers to infection with human papillomavirus (HPV) has renewed efforts to control cervical cancer, especially in developing countries where it remains the leading cause of cancer deaths among women. Primary and secondary prevention efforts have begun to focus on detection and control of the virus, specifically HPV DNA testing for screening [1][2][3][4][5][6][7] and HPV vaccine development for prevention. 8 Critical to the success of HPV-based prevention efforts is a comprehensive spectrum of targeted genotypes, given that at least 10 different HPV types have been classified as group 1 human carcinogens. 9 The International Biological Study of Invasive Cervical Cancer (IBSCC) demonstrated that certain HPV genotypes, namely, HPV-16, -18, -31 and -45, accounted for 80% of the sampled invasive cancers from 21 countries. 10,11 Based on these results, vaccine efforts are targeted first to HPV-16, with the hope of reducing the cervical cancer burden by up to 50%, presumably with vaccines targeting HPV-18, -31 and -45 to follow. However, a study in Mozambique found that HPV-35 was the most prevalent genotype, both in all HPV-positive women (16.7 %) and among women with cervical neoplasia (18.4%). 12 It is important to determine if this is a geographically isolated finding or if the relative prevalence of HPV types attributable to cervical cancer development differs in sub-Saharan Africa, where primary prevention offers the greatest promise of control. We report the genotype distribution of HPV from a nested case-control study of women originally enrolled in a visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA) screening study in Harare, Zimbabwe. 13 Study participants were drawn from subjects enrolled in phase II VIA screening study conducted jointly by the University of Zimbabwe in Harare and the JHPIEGO Corporation, a Johns Hopkins University affiliate based in Baltimore, MD, USA. Details of subject recruitment have been described elsewhere. 13 Briefly, subjects enrolled in phase II of the VIA screening study were recruited from October 1996 through August 1997 among women aged 25-55 years attending 15 primary-care clinics in Chitungwiza and the greater Harare area of Zimbabwe. All enrolled women provided verbal informed consent, and the institutional review boards of both participating institutions approved study protocols. Participants were interviewed using a standardized questionnaire to assess demographics. Following the interview, each participant consented to a pelvic exam with collection of cells for Pap smear and HPV DNA testing. VIA screening was performed last. All participants were offered a colposcopic examination of the cervix, and biopsies were collected if indicated, usually on the same day. At the colposcopy visit, consenting women (23%) provided an oral mucosal specimen (OraSure; Epitope, Beaverton, OR) for HIV antibody testing (duplicate testing via commercially available ELISA; Organon Teknica, Durham, NC...