1993
DOI: 10.1128/jcm.31.9.2483-2488.1993
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevalence and some properties of verotoxin (Shiga-like toxin)-producing Escherichia coli in seven different species of healthy domestic animals

Abstract: Fecal samples from 720 healthy, domestic animals representing seven different species (cattle, sheep, goats, pigs, chickens, dogs, and cats) were investigated for verotoxin (VT [Shiga-like toxin])-producing Escherichia coli (VTEC). VTEC were isolated from 208 animals (28.9%), most frequently from sheep (66.6% VTEC carriers), goats (56.1%), and cattle (21.1%). VTEC were isolated less frequently from pigs (7.5%), cats

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

35
243
13
17

Year Published

2000
2000
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 484 publications
(308 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
35
243
13
17
Order By: Relevance
“…These false positives may occur when E. coli isolates produce a narrow and turbid halo because of a low expression of alpha-haemolysin or when vancomycin enhances the haemolysis of some non-STEC which may show weak haemolysis [3]. It is also possible that the faecal multiplex PCR primers [7] may not have detected some haemolysin variants [4] or the mEC broth may have had an inhibitory e¡ect on the PCR assay. A disadvantage of the direct culture on BVCCA for the detection of complex STEC is that it does not select for eaeA positive and ehxA negative STEC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These false positives may occur when E. coli isolates produce a narrow and turbid halo because of a low expression of alpha-haemolysin or when vancomycin enhances the haemolysis of some non-STEC which may show weak haemolysis [3]. It is also possible that the faecal multiplex PCR primers [7] may not have detected some haemolysin variants [4] or the mEC broth may have had an inhibitory e¡ect on the PCR assay. A disadvantage of the direct culture on BVCCA for the detection of complex STEC is that it does not select for eaeA positive and ehxA negative STEC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies performed in Sweden on cats either with or without symptoms of diarrhea established a 40% prevalence for STEC in clinically healthy cats and 95% in cats with diarrhea (Abaas et al, 1989). Other studies in Germany have reported a prevalence of around 4% and 14% in healthy and symptomatic pets, respectively (Beutin et al, 1993). The isolation of STEC O157:H7 in a dog (Khakhria et al, 1990) and a clinical case associated with HUS symptoms in a dog (Dell'Orco et al, 2005) have also been reported, although in the latter it is not clear whether the strain isolated was actually STEC.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Escherichia coli O157:H7: an emerging food-and water-borne pathogen detected in a wide spectrum of animal species (cattle, sheep, goat, deer, moose, swine, horse, dog, cat, pigeon, chicken, turkey, gull) sometimes even with considerable prevalence (Beutin et al, 1993;Wieler et al, 1996). In particular, cattle have been identified as major reservoirs of STEC strains that are highly virulent in the human host (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%