2020
DOI: 10.1089/fpd.2019.2741
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevalence, Antimicrobial Resistance, and Pathogenic Potential of Enterotoxigenic and Enteropathogenic Escherichia coli Associated with Acute Diarrheal Patients in Tangail, Bangladesh

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

6
4
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
6
4
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The results obtained here are in accordance with a previous study in India where ETEC resistance to ciprofloxacin was reported (Chakraborty et al, 2001). In this investigation, it was observed that more than 60% of CS6harbouring ETEC isolates of this region showed resistance towards nalidixic acid, azithromycin and tetracycline which were also observed in ETEC strains of Bangladesh showing similar resistance to the above antibiotics (Rahman et al, 2020). A study in Eastern Odisha, India revealed that more than 50% of ETEC strains were resistant to ceftriaxone and 2.4% of those isolates were resistant to imipenem (Moharana et al, 2019), whereas our investigation showed only 6% strains were resistant to ceftriaxone and no strains were resistant to imipenem.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The results obtained here are in accordance with a previous study in India where ETEC resistance to ciprofloxacin was reported (Chakraborty et al, 2001). In this investigation, it was observed that more than 60% of CS6harbouring ETEC isolates of this region showed resistance towards nalidixic acid, azithromycin and tetracycline which were also observed in ETEC strains of Bangladesh showing similar resistance to the above antibiotics (Rahman et al, 2020). A study in Eastern Odisha, India revealed that more than 50% of ETEC strains were resistant to ceftriaxone and 2.4% of those isolates were resistant to imipenem (Moharana et al, 2019), whereas our investigation showed only 6% strains were resistant to ceftriaxone and no strains were resistant to imipenem.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…We found that E. coli isolates were resistant to most antibiotics tested, except Meropenem (100% susceptible), Imipenem (100% susceptible), and to some extent tetracycline (66.4% susceptible), chloramphenicol (66.4%), and amikacin (70% susceptible). Other researchers working on patients' urinary tract infections [25], acute diarrhoea [26] and strains occurring in humans, animals or food [27,28] reported also a resistance of E. coli to multiple drugs. Here, 68% of E. coli isolates were found to be multidrug resistant (to more than 3 antibiotic families).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 41 , 44 Although some strains of E. coli isolated from human diarrheal cases were lacking the known virulence determinants other than the EAST1 gene thus making it a potential virulence factor. 41 , 45 During the second international symposium on EPEC conducted in 1995 in São Paulo, Brazil, most of the participants had agreed and defined EPEC as DEC that produces characteristic histopathology known as attaching and effacing (A/E) on intestinal cells and not expressing Shiga-toxin genes. 14 However, the tEPEC strains harbor a virulence plasmid known as the EPEC adherence factor (EAF) plasmid.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…41,44 Although some strains of E. coli isolated from human diarrheal cases were lacking the known virulence determinants other than the EAST1 gene thus making it a potential virulence factor. 41,45 During the second international…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%