2022
DOI: 10.1097/cce.0000000000000703
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevalence, Clinical Characteristics, and Outcomes of Sepsis Caused by Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Versus Other Pathogens in Hospitalized Patients With COVID-19

Abstract: IMPORTANCE:The prevalence and causes of sepsis in patients hospitalized with COVID-19 are poorly characterized. OBJECTIVES:To investigate the prevalence, clinical characteristics, and outcomes of sepsis caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) versus other pathogens in patients hospitalized with COVID-19. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS:Cross-sectional, retrospective chart review of 200 randomly selected patients hospitalized with COVID-19 at four Massachusetts hospitals between… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
24
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
2
24
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…between estimates of SARS-CoV-2-associated sepsis incidence using our EHR-based approach and previous approaches using medical record reviews and pooled organ dysfunctions provides further support for its validity. 17 In-hospital mortality was higher for SARS-CoV-2-associated sepsis vs presumed bacterial sepsis during the first 10 quarters of the COVID-19 pandemic but decreased over time. This finding emphasizes the potential of respiratory viruses to trigger severe, life-threatening disease and underscores the peril of our relative lack of effective antiviral therapeutics for most respiratory viruses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…between estimates of SARS-CoV-2-associated sepsis incidence using our EHR-based approach and previous approaches using medical record reviews and pooled organ dysfunctions provides further support for its validity. 17 In-hospital mortality was higher for SARS-CoV-2-associated sepsis vs presumed bacterial sepsis during the first 10 quarters of the COVID-19 pandemic but decreased over time. This finding emphasizes the potential of respiratory viruses to trigger severe, life-threatening disease and underscores the peril of our relative lack of effective antiviral therapeutics for most respiratory viruses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…[12][13][14][15][16] Previous investigations specifically assessing the prevalence and outcomes for SARS-CoV-2-associated sepsis have been limited by small sample sizes, single center design, and/or heterogeneous definitions of organ dysfunction, and were conducted using data from early in the COVID-19 pandemic. 17,18 Electronic health record (EHR)-based surveillance using clinical markers of concurrent infection and organ dysfunction is rapidly becoming the state-of-the-art method for widescale sepsis surveillance. 10,19 This strategy allows for more objective and reproducible analyses across hospitals and has been used by the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to quantify the national burden of sepsis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A COVID-19 infection has also been found to manifest a primary septic shock event in upwards of 70.8% of total septic episodes in a cohort by Shappell et al , thereby underscoring the need for vigilance in infected patients 33 . Subsequently, a con-current COVID-19 infection almost doubles the incidence of mortality among those experiencing septic shock, regardless of cause 34 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…As an example, surviving sepsis guidelines have been written specifically for COVID-19 (Alhazzani et al 2021), yet have a high degree of overlap for managing sepsis in general. Published reports refer to patients with "sepsis caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)" (Shappell et al 2022), while others underline the differences between the two diseases (Klaz 2021). At the very least, the two conditions have many parallels at the clinical as well as molecular level suggesting a similar underlying pathogenesis (Olwal et al 2021;Baghela et al 2022).…”
Section: Deregulated Mirnas and Their Role In Covid-19 Diseasementioning
confidence: 99%