Prevalence, Clinical Management, and Natural Course of Incidental Findings on Brain MR Images: The Population-based Rotterdam Scan Study

Abstract

Purpose To present an updated prevalence estimate for incidental findings on brain magnetic resonance (MR) images and provide information on clinical relevance, including natural course, over a period of up to 9 years. Materials and Methods This study was approved by the institutional review board and all participants gave informed consent. In a prospective population-based setting, structural brain MR imaging was performed in 5800 participants (mean age, 64.9 years; 3194 women [55.1%]). Trained reviewers recorded abnormalities, which were subsequently evaluated by neuroradiologists. The prevalence with 95% confidence interval (CI) of incidental findings was determined, and clinical management of findings that required the attention of a medical specialist was followed. Follow-up imaging in the study context provided information on the natural course of findings that were not referred. Results In 549 of 5800 participants (9.5% [95% CI: 8.7%, 10.3%]), incidental findings were found, of which meningiomas (143 of 5800; 2.5% [95% CI: 2.1%, 2.9%]) and cerebral aneurysms (134 of 5800; 2.3% [95% CI: 2.0%, 2.7%]) were most common. A total of 188 participants were referred to medical specialists for incidental findings (3.2% [95% CI: 2.8%, 3.7%]). Of these, 144 (76.6% [95% CI: 70.1%, 82.1%]) either underwent a wait-and-see policy or were discharged after the initial clinical visit. The majority of meningiomas and virtually all aneurysms not referred or referred but untreated remained stable in size during follow-up. Conclusion Incidental findings at brain MR imaging that necessitate further diagnostic evaluation occur in over 3% of the general middle-aged and elderly population, but are mostly without direct clinical consequences. RSNA, 2016.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Based Screening for Asymptomatic Brain Tumors: A Review

“…The two major studies examining the prevalence of asymptomatic brain tumors in older populations are the Rotterdam study and the HUNT MRI study . The Rotterdam study was originally designed to identify risk factors for various chronic diseases (cardiovascular, endocrine, respiratory, etc.)…”

Incidental findings on brain MRI of cognitively normal first-degree descendants of patients with Alzheimer's disease: a cross-sectional analysis from the ALFA (Alzheimer and Families) project

“…In agreement, other studies in older populations have found significantly higher occurrences of IF. In observational studies, 32% (from a total of 700 participants, mean age 72.5 years), 7 9.5% (from a total of 5800 participants with a mean age of 64.9 years) 8 and 77.9% (from a total of 503 participants with a mean age of 75.3 years) 9 of asymptomatic participants presented with IF. Therefore, IF are commonly revealed in neuroimaging research, but their occurrence greatly differs between study populations.…”

Cerebrovascular disorders associated with genetic lesions

“…More than 70 years later, Cushing [13] and Dandy [14, 15] independently reported extensive series of cerebrovascular malformations, which were subsequently classified into distinct histopathological subtypes (telangiectasias, cerebral cavernous malformations, venous malformations, and arteriovenous malformations) [16, 17]. They occur with a high prevalence (estimated to be 4 - 6 % in earlier reports [18-20], but approximately 3% in recent population-based brain magnetic resonance imaging [MRI] studies [21]) around the globe in all ethnicities, and although they are most often sporadic, familial forms are not infrequent.…”

“…CCM are common cerebrovascular lesions, also termed cavernomas, in the CNS and, rarely, the retina, with an estimated prevalence of 0.3-0.9%, on the basis of large prospective autopsy studies, clinically-based and population-based brain MR images [18, 21-29]. Cavernomas are collections of enlarged, densely packed vascular sinusoids with abnormal structure lined with a single layer of endothelial cells and lacking vessel wall elements, embedded in a collagen matrix without intervening brain parenchyma [16, 17].…”