2018
DOI: 10.1111/tan.13263
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevalence, distribution and amplitude of the complement interference phenomenon in single antigen flow beads assays

Abstract: HLA antibody detection with single antigen flow beads (SAFB) assays is impaired by complement interference whose frequency, predictability and distribution among HLA antigens have not been analyzed in large cohorts. We compared in two patients' cohorts the routine follow-up SAFB profiles obtained in class I (n = 129) and class II (n = 85) with and without ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA)-treatment. The presence of complement interference was defined according to the reproducibility of the SAFB assays eva… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The formation of the C1 complex can be inhibited by pretreatment of the blood sample with heat, dithiothreitol (DTT), or ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) . Using plasma samples or adding EDTA to the patient serum sample has meanwhile become the preferred option of many HLA laboratories to prevent this so‐called “complement interference” , which often is still erroneously termed “prozone effect” as pointed out by Berth et al . .…”
Section: Technical Challenges and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The formation of the C1 complex can be inhibited by pretreatment of the blood sample with heat, dithiothreitol (DTT), or ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) . Using plasma samples or adding EDTA to the patient serum sample has meanwhile become the preferred option of many HLA laboratories to prevent this so‐called “complement interference” , which often is still erroneously termed “prozone effect” as pointed out by Berth et al . .…”
Section: Technical Challenges and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these studies were conducted before the discovery of 2 major interferences with SAFB results. The first is the complement interference phenomenon, which prevents the detection, or leads to the underestimation, of high‐titer antibodies . The second is the detection of antibodies against denatured HLA (anti‐dHLA), particularly class I HLA, which are strongly suspected to be clinically irrelevant .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Importantly, luminex SAB assays are semiquantitative at best, since MFI values do not reflect antibody titers . Furthermore, false‐positive reactions are observed because of antibody reactivity to denatured HLA molecules on the beads while false‐negative results are because of the so‐called prozone effect or interference of serum substances other than IgG . Although not part of the commercial protocol provided by the manufacturers of the IgG SAB assays, serial dilutions, heat inactivation or hypotonic dialysis of the serum samples as well as pretreatment with dithiothreitol (DTT) or ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) are means to circumvent the prozone effect or interference of serum components such as IgM and complement in the detection of circulating IgG antibodies .…”
Section: Why Luminex Sab Data Should Be Interpreted With Cautionmentioning
confidence: 99%