2022
DOI: 10.30699/ijmm.16.3.212
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevalence Escherichia coli, Klebsiella and Enterobacter Species and AmpC-producing Enterobacteriaceae in Clinical Specimens of Hospitals Affiliated to Babol University of Medical Sciences, Iran using Phenotypic and Molecular Methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…26 AmpC production was detected in 13.1% isolates, which is slightly lower than the study done by Shivanna and Rao, 5 but similar to Mirza et al 8 Many studies too indicate boronic acid disc-diffusion test as a better method than other phenotypic methods to identify the producers of AmpC although no specific confirmatory phenotypic tests have been announced for the detection of AmpC enzymes by CLSI so far. 27 Our result for MBL production was found to be much higher (14.8%) than the studies done by Mirza et al, 8 but lower than that reported by Chanu et al 7 The difference in the prevalence rate in our study could also be endorsed due to various factors such as our hospital antibiotic guidelines and practices, ethnic differences in various populations, different phenotypic methods and procedures performed in other studies. 25 28…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 63%
“…26 AmpC production was detected in 13.1% isolates, which is slightly lower than the study done by Shivanna and Rao, 5 but similar to Mirza et al 8 Many studies too indicate boronic acid disc-diffusion test as a better method than other phenotypic methods to identify the producers of AmpC although no specific confirmatory phenotypic tests have been announced for the detection of AmpC enzymes by CLSI so far. 27 Our result for MBL production was found to be much higher (14.8%) than the studies done by Mirza et al, 8 but lower than that reported by Chanu et al 7 The difference in the prevalence rate in our study could also be endorsed due to various factors such as our hospital antibiotic guidelines and practices, ethnic differences in various populations, different phenotypic methods and procedures performed in other studies. 25 28…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 63%
“…According to Shahandeh Z et al study in Iran out of 259 isolated E. coli, the ESBL-producing E. coli were 137 (52.9%). 15 In our study, out of 139 stool samples tested, 106 E. coli isolates were obtained; out of those isolates, 33.96% were carriage of resistance to one or more antibiotics and MDR was 7.55%. Resistance was most frequently observed to Ampicillin (27.36%) and a study in Tamil Nadu done by Seidman JC et al showed that ≥1 antibiotic resistance rate of 63% and multiple drug resistance of 32%, respectively, in 119 E. coli colony pools (stool samples) analyzed.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…This study showed the prevalence of MBL in K. pneumoniae and E. coli to be 15.4%, and 9.4% respectively giving an overall prevalence of 12%. [27]. Bora et al [19] reported a prevalence of 18.98% and 21.08% in E coli and K. pneumoniae respectively in Nepal [19].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%