2022
DOI: 10.1017/s0033291722002690
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevalence, incidence, and persistence of psychotic experiences in the general population: results of a 9-year follow-up study

Abstract: Background Psychotic experiences (PEs) frequently occur and are associated with a range of negative health outcomes. Prospective studies on PEs are scarce, and to date no study investigated PE prevalence, incidence, persistence, their risk indicators, and psychiatric comorbidity, in one dataset. Furthermore, most studies are based on self-report, and it is unclear how this compares to clinical interviews. Methods Data are used from the Netherlands Mental Health Survey and Incidence Study… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, our results support lifetime PEs as relatively common in general populations. Twenty-six percent reported at least one lifetime PE—a higher prevalence than reported by previous meta-analyses based on CAPE and the CIDI (Composite International Diagnostic Interview) psychosis module 50 (5.8% 2 ; 7.2% 1 ) – although within the range of reported cross-national prevalence (0.8% to 31.4% 15 , 17 , 51 , 52 ). Although the sample is relatively healthy and well-educated, there may be several reasons why a high percentage still reports lifetime PEs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 50%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, our results support lifetime PEs as relatively common in general populations. Twenty-six percent reported at least one lifetime PE—a higher prevalence than reported by previous meta-analyses based on CAPE and the CIDI (Composite International Diagnostic Interview) psychosis module 50 (5.8% 2 ; 7.2% 1 ) – although within the range of reported cross-national prevalence (0.8% to 31.4% 15 , 17 , 51 , 52 ). Although the sample is relatively healthy and well-educated, there may be several reasons why a high percentage still reports lifetime PEs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 50%
“… 1 However, associations between PEs and variables of interest are usually comparable. 51 In large cohort studies, cost-effective data collection is necessary, and despite being a short self-report instrument, our psychometric investigations support CAPE-9 as valid and useful.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…However, it would have been preferable to use widely-validated semi-structured interviews, such as the SIPS ( 16 ) or the CAARMS ( 13 ). In this regard, it is relevant to note that a recent large-scale study found that both self-report and interview measures of psychotic experiences were associated with similar risk indicators ( 142 ). Finally, our use of a non-random sampling technique (participants were individuals with Internet access who were interested in responding to the survey) and the fact that the sample was predominantly female with a relatively high educational level limit the generalizability of the results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Psychotic experiences (PE) consist of subclinical hallucinations and delusions that occur among individuals in the general population ( 1 ). An earlier review study that used data from 61 cohorts found that the median estimated prevalence of PE was 7.2% in the general population ( 2 ), while more recent research has indicated that the self-reported lifetime prevalence of at least one PE may be substantially higher (16.5%) in some instances ( 3 ). PE have been linked to a variety of detrimental outcomes in adults including worse physical ( 4 ) and mental health ( 5 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%