1966
DOI: 10.2307/4592710
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevalence of Amblyopia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
20
0
2

Year Published

1982
1982
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
2
20
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Robaei et al, 2006). Flom and Neumaier’s (1966) sample of over 7000 people examined in a university eye clinic revealed an amblyopia prevalence of 0.4% based upon a VA criterion of 20/200 or worse. The figure rose to 2%, 3.4% and 9% when the criterion was altered to 20/40 or worse, 20/30 or worse and 20/25 or worse, respectively [see their figure 2].…”
Section: Prevalencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Robaei et al, 2006). Flom and Neumaier’s (1966) sample of over 7000 people examined in a university eye clinic revealed an amblyopia prevalence of 0.4% based upon a VA criterion of 20/200 or worse. The figure rose to 2%, 3.4% and 9% when the criterion was altered to 20/40 or worse, 20/30 or worse and 20/25 or worse, respectively [see their figure 2].…”
Section: Prevalencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 The disorder is associated with strabismus, anisometropia, or a form of deprivation early in life. [2][3][4][5][6] Several studies have been performed with electrophysiological methods used in humans and in animal models, to investigate the retinal and visual system in AM dysfunction.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As shown in Figure 12A, the degree of amblyopia was not related to the deviating eye’s refractive error at the time the behavioral measurements were performed (r 2 = 0.012; P = 0.21). However as observed in strabismic children with anisometropia (Flom & Bedell, 1985, Flom & Neumaier, 1966), monkeys with significant degrees of anisometropia were more likely to be amblyopic (Figure 12B). There was a significant negative correlation in the interocular grating acuity ratio and the degree of hyperopic anisometropia (r 2 = 0.62; P < 0.0001).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 64%