2011
DOI: 10.2478/s11756-011-0016-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevalence of avian influenza viruses, Mycobacterium avium, and Mycobacterium avium, subsp. paratuberculosis in marsh-dwelling passerines in Slovakia, 2008

Abstract: Prevalence of the infectious respiratory agens, avian influenza virus (AIV), Mycobacterium avium (M. avium), and Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis (MAP), was studied in migratory marsh-dwelling passerines captured in the Parížske močiare wetlands in Western Slovakia during 2008. Surveillance of 650 birds revealed a lower prevalence of AIV in spring (13.6%) than in summer (17.5%). A total of 14 different subtypes were detected in samples obtained from birds captured during the spring, with the mos… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although certain passerines were found to be infected with Mycobacterium spp. (Borovská et al 2011) there are no sufficient data to explicitly implicate Sylvidae as a major reservoir compared to other animal hosts. Similarly, the members of the family Macroscelidae were reportedly infected with Mycobacteria (Clancy et al 2013), the evidence is not sufficient to conclude the validity of the results.…”
Section: Feature Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although certain passerines were found to be infected with Mycobacterium spp. (Borovská et al 2011) there are no sufficient data to explicitly implicate Sylvidae as a major reservoir compared to other animal hosts. Similarly, the members of the family Macroscelidae were reportedly infected with Mycobacteria (Clancy et al 2013), the evidence is not sufficient to conclude the validity of the results.…”
Section: Feature Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Third, prior studies of AIV in songbirds or mammals have often included habitat types with little or no potential for interaction among species of concern (i.e., waterfowl), thus missing or diluting the most important sampling locations ( Peterson et al, 2008 ; Siengsanan et al, 2009 ; Fuller et al, 2010 ; Thinh et al, 2012 ; but see also Zhao et al, 2014 ; Caron et al, 2014 ; Leon et al, 2013 ; Peterson et al, 2008 ; Siengsanan et al, 2009 ; Fuller et al, 2010 ). In contrast, ideal sampling should focus on habitats where potential bridge hosts, including small mammals and birds, are most likely to interact with known AIV reservoirs like migratory waterfowl and shorebirds (e.g., wetlands and marshes) and to interact with poultry or their feed (e.g., commercial poultry operations, or feed-mills that serve those operations) ( Caron et al, 2014 ; Caron et al, 2015 ; Gronesova et al, 2008 ; Borovská et al, 2011 ; Cumming et al, 2011 ). Hence, the actual role of small birds and mammals in spreading AIV has not been definitively evaluated, particularly in the United States, even though these species have the potential to carry AIV biologically and mechanically.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%