2004
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.2004.00363.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevalence of bipolar disorder in the general population: a Reappraisal Study of the Netherlands Mental Health Survey and Incidence Study

Abstract: Compared with the SCID, the CIDI on the one hand overdiagnoses bipolar disorder but on the other hand underdiagnoses bipolar disorder.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
57
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(26 reference statements)
1
57
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The reported lifetime prevalence for bipolar spectrum disorders (Bipolar I, II or NOS) is about 5.5% (Angst 1995;Regeer et al 2004), although slight deviations of these numbers may occur depending on the sample (Merikangas et al 2007). Together with increasing evidence of an underlying genetic aetiology (Hayden and Nurnberger 2006) the relatively uniform epidemiological figures support, without neglecting ethnic and cultural diversity, that an optimised biological, mostly psychopharmacological, treatment may bring comparable benefits across cultures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reported lifetime prevalence for bipolar spectrum disorders (Bipolar I, II or NOS) is about 5.5% (Angst 1995;Regeer et al 2004), although slight deviations of these numbers may occur depending on the sample (Merikangas et al 2007). Together with increasing evidence of an underlying genetic aetiology (Hayden and Nurnberger 2006) the relatively uniform epidemiological figures support, without neglecting ethnic and cultural diversity, that an optimised biological, mostly psychopharmacological, treatment may bring comparable benefits across cultures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This means that the NCS-R sub-threshold BPD prevalence estimate is likely to be a lower bound estimate, although it is broadly consistent with the results of two large community epidemiological surveys in Europe. 62,63 Turning now to prevalence estimates for working people, 12-month prevalence estimates of MDD and BPD among working NCS-R respondents are somewhat lower than in the total sample: 6.4% for MDD and 1.1% for BPD. 7 This pattern is consistent with the finding in previous surveys that mood disorder is associated with not being in the labor force 64,65 and with the results of controlled intervention studies that treatment of depression is associated with a significant reduction in termination of labor force participation.…”
Section: Prevalencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…39,40 However, it is likely to be a lower bound because we did not include reduced duration of hypomanic episodes. The NCS-R results clearly document the clinical significance of subthreshold BPD, as most subthreshold cases had moderate-severe symptom profiles and role impairment based on standard rating scales.…”
Section: Commentmentioning
confidence: 99%