1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(05)65142-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevalence of coeliac disease in Northern Ireland

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
57
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 142 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
3
57
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Before the development of powerful screening methods for coeliac disease, the prevalence of coeliac disease in Caucasian populations was generally estimated to be in the order of 0.1 % [6]. During the last few years, the invention of sensitive methods, especially of the assay for endomysium antibodies, has led to a number of reports giving considerably higher prevalence figures, ranging from 0.3 % up to 1.2 %, among both children and adults [7,8]. Using the same endomysium antibody method, we previously found a prevalence of coeliac disease of 0.8 % among 1070 Finnish adults [9].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Before the development of powerful screening methods for coeliac disease, the prevalence of coeliac disease in Caucasian populations was generally estimated to be in the order of 0.1 % [6]. During the last few years, the invention of sensitive methods, especially of the assay for endomysium antibodies, has led to a number of reports giving considerably higher prevalence figures, ranging from 0.3 % up to 1.2 %, among both children and adults [7,8]. Using the same endomysium antibody method, we previously found a prevalence of coeliac disease of 0.8 % among 1070 Finnish adults [9].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13 Epidemiological studies, performed by accurate serological screening in the general population, have radically changed our knowledge about CD prevalence, showing that the disease occurs worldwide much more frequently than previously thought (Table 1). [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21] The highest reported prevalence is in Europe: 1 in 99 in Finland, 1 in 122 in Northern Ireland and 1 in 175 people in Italy. 16,20,21 Until a few years ago, gluten-sensitive enteropathy was erroneously considered uncommon in the United States, but serological screening in healthy blood donors has revealed a prevalence approaching that of Europe (1 in 250).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21] The highest reported prevalence is in Europe: 1 in 99 in Finland, 1 in 122 in Northern Ireland and 1 in 175 people in Italy. 16,20,21 Until a few years ago, gluten-sensitive enteropathy was erroneously considered uncommon in the United States, but serological screening in healthy blood donors has revealed a prevalence approaching that of Europe (1 in 250). 22 Whereas CD is well documented in Asians from India and Pakistan, 23 it is rare among native Japanese and Chinese.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 IgA nephropathy, immune complex-associated or membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis are the most common forms of renal involvement in patients with Celiac disease. 4 Secondary forms of FSGS are generally considered to result from maladaptive responses that occur due to loss of functioning nephrons, hyperfiltration or increased glomerular pressure. It was demonstrated that loss of podocytes which starts with injury to the podocytewas pivotal in FSGS resulting from these maladaptive responses.…”
Section: A Case Of Celiac Disease With Focal Segmental Glomerulosclermentioning
confidence: 99%