2016
DOI: 10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20151621
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevalence of congenital abnormalities on routine ultrasound scan of second and third trimester pregnancy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The incidence of congenital malformation varies widely from country to country [2] and from region to region, with a range of 1.73 to 6.3% [12][13][14]. For example, it was reported to be 1.7% in Brazil [15], 2.22% in Eastern India [16], 3.63% in Iraq [17], 6.3% in Nigeria 6.3% [14].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The incidence of congenital malformation varies widely from country to country [2] and from region to region, with a range of 1.73 to 6.3% [12][13][14]. For example, it was reported to be 1.7% in Brazil [15], 2.22% in Eastern India [16], 3.63% in Iraq [17], 6.3% in Nigeria 6.3% [14].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors in that study evaluated which the prevalence of congenital anomalies during only one year among live born neonates. They concluded that the congenital anomalies among live born neonates were 63 cases among 2517 (2.5%) [17]. The incidence of congenital malformations ranged from 1.2% to 7% as reported by many authors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Pradhan Mantri Surakshit Matritva Abhiyan (PMSMA), launched in 2016, supports pregnant mothers during the 2nd and 3rd trimester of pregnancy by detecting high-risk pregnancies and providing special antenatal services at government hospitals. Under this initiative, technologies such as ultrasound have been efficiently used in the gestational period to detect structural anomalies that can provide the family and relatives with more information and choices [ 23 ]. Families with previous history of an RD may be categorized under high-risk pregnancies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Families with previous history of an RD may be categorized under high-risk pregnancies. This provides an opportunity to the family to avail timely multidisciplinary maternal–fetal intervention and an option to terminate the pregnancy in extreme cases [ 23 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%