1990
DOI: 10.7883/yoken1952.43.7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevalence of Cryptosporidium Infection Among Domestic Cats in the Tokyo Metropolitan District, Japan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

5
14
1

Year Published

1991
1991
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
5
14
1
Order By: Relevance
“…(9.8%) and Cryptosporidium spp. (4.7%) observed in the 344 shelter cats were consistent with those of previous studies 10, 25 and within the 2.4% 12 to 14% 11 for Giardia spp. and the 2.0 % 12 to 12.3% 13 for Cryptosporidium spp.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…(9.8%) and Cryptosporidium spp. (4.7%) observed in the 344 shelter cats were consistent with those of previous studies 10, 25 and within the 2.4% 12 to 14% 11 for Giardia spp. and the 2.0 % 12 to 12.3% 13 for Cryptosporidium spp.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…43 Based on the results of the fecal flotation, Cryptosporidium was detected at a slightly higher rate (3.8%) than Salmonella or Campylobacter. The prevalence is consistent with that found in a study of cats in Tokyo (3.8%), 24 in client-owned and shelter cats in Colorado (2.0%), 14 and for pet cats in an urban area of Australia (1.2%). 44 However, this prevalence is slightly lower than that found in nonferal cats tested in Scotland (5.2%), but many of the cats in the Scottish study were referrals to a university veterinary hospital and diagnoses were often based on postmortem examination.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…With the exception of this 1 study, most previous studies on the prevalence of Salmonella in cats predate 1980 [15][16][17][18][19][20][21] and recent prevalence studies on Cryptosporidium and Campylobacter have been conducted primarily outside the United States. [22][23][24][25][26][27] Also, some previous studies suggested that the prevalence of these organisms may vary with the environmental risks of cats and that young cats may be at higher risk than mature cats. 19,23,26 To better assess the risks associated with ownership of young cats, we conducted a study to determine the prevalence of 5 groups of potentially zoonotic enteric infections (Salmonella sp., Campylobacter sp., Cryptosporidium sp., Giardia sp., and Toxocara cati) in fecal samples from cats under 1 year of age that were either housed in humane shelters or presented to primary-care veterinarians in central New York State.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The present study showed that 2.4% of the cats were shedding Cryptosporidium oocysts. Although the infection rate of cats in this study was lower than those reported in other studies, 25,26 cats may play an important role in the transmission of disease in terms of cat-human contact or environmental contamination by shedding oocysts. In Brazil, animals serve as a reservoir of Cryptosporidium, with the potential for contamination of immediate household water sources.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 78%