2016
DOI: 10.20431/2456-0030.0102004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevalence of Dental Anomalies among Schools Children in Sana'a City, Yemen

Abstract: Objective: This study was designed to determine the relation of gender and systemic causes with dental anomalies. Methods: This study was conducted on (1000) of schools children,(500) boys and (500) girls with an age ranged from 4-12 years. The sample was collected from five private and four public schools at Sana'a city, Yemen. Children were examined at schools, under natural day light with a disposable mouth mirrors, using gloves and gauze pads. Results: Enamel hypoplasia (2.8%) was the most prevalent dental… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 13 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Animal bite marks differ in many aspects significantly from those caused by humans -but correct identification of the particular animal species or even dog race tends to cause a lot of problems, although-as it was mentioned before -even individual identification of a particular animal is possible in some cases [9]. It is possible in a significant part because of numerous macroscopically recognizable dental anomalies that cause differences in bite marks patterns -which was proven also by studies in humans [14]. In many cases the bite marks provide as unique and trustworthy identification as fingerprints thus they are very important to forensic activitiesthe methodology of acquiring and using this kind of data was developed primarily for the purposes of criminal inquiries and personal identification of humans.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Animal bite marks differ in many aspects significantly from those caused by humans -but correct identification of the particular animal species or even dog race tends to cause a lot of problems, although-as it was mentioned before -even individual identification of a particular animal is possible in some cases [9]. It is possible in a significant part because of numerous macroscopically recognizable dental anomalies that cause differences in bite marks patterns -which was proven also by studies in humans [14]. In many cases the bite marks provide as unique and trustworthy identification as fingerprints thus they are very important to forensic activitiesthe methodology of acquiring and using this kind of data was developed primarily for the purposes of criminal inquiries and personal identification of humans.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%