“…Given this, it remain possible that the subjects who were included as 'controls' might have been GDD-positive in reality. It could be possible, especially considering their proportion in sample C, which is 9.1% both of DS and for DSs (based on DS score ≥ 26, and DSs score ≥ 12), which corresponds reasonably well to the prevalence rate of depressive disorder estimated in general population of Latvia and in primary care settings (Rancans et al, 2014;Rancans, Vrublevska, Kivite, et al, 2016;Vrublevska et al, 2017).…”